Realme is planning to launch Realme GT 7, a predecessor of GT 6 (although the company also launched GT 7 Pro a couple of months ago with SD 8 Elite), this will be the phone to feature flagship from Mediatek. This article will discuss everything about the latest Realme GT 7, including its expected price in Nepal, specifications, and availability.
Realme GT 7 Rumors
Performance
Realme GT 7 will feature the Dimensity 9400 Plus chipset. There is no information regarding the 9400 Plus, but it is expected to be slightly overclocked version of the regular 9400. Realme aims to be the first to launch a smartphone with the Dimensity 9400 Plus chipset. Competing models include devices from Oppo, Vivo, iQOO, Redmi, and OnePlus.
For a gaming phone, the GT 7 will likely feature up to 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage. But it is not confirmed yet.
Display and Battery
The smartphone is rumored to feature a massive 7,000mAh battery and 100W fast charging. Many phones in 2025 are bound to break the battery standards, which ranged from 5k to 6k with this new 7K battery. Expect it to last more than 10 hours on a single charge. Similarly, the phone also has a flat display and measures 8.4mm in thickness, weighing 207g.
Tech enthusiasts, get ready for an exciting new device. Vivo has announced its Mixed Reality (MR) headset at the prestigious Boao Forum for Asia. This innovative device marks Vivo’s entry into the spatial computing market. This article will discuss everything about the latest Vivo Vision, including its expected price in Nepal, specifications, and availability.
Vivo Vision Overview
Product Launch
Vivo revealed its Mixed Reality headset as part of its broader technology strategy. The company aims to strengthen its spatial computing capabilities for consumer robotics.
Robotics and Technology Development
The company has established a dedicated Robotics Laboratory to develop advanced technological solutions. Additionally, Vivo is leveraging expertise in AI, imaging technologies, and spatial computing to create this new product.
Blue Technology Matrix
Vivo introduced its Blue Technology Matrix, which includes key components:
BlueImage
BlueLM
BlueOS
BlueChip
BlueVolt
Vivo Vision Price in Nepal and Availability
While official pricing is not yet available, the device is expected to be more affordable than competing products like Apple Vision Pro. Based on preliminary estimates, the price in Nepal would likely start at approximately NPR 150,000.
Meanwhile, check out our review of the Vivo X200 Pro
So ever since Apple launched the M1 MacBook Air (review) back in 2020, the craze for MacBooks has just… skyrocketed. That thing was such a perfect little laptop for $1,000 that it made every Windows laptop at a similar price look like such a bad deal.
Fast forward to 2025, Apple’s newest MacBook Air now ships with a much more powerful M4 chip, it now has 16 gigs of memory in the base model instead of just 8 gigs, and it still starts at $1,000. And yep… if you’re looking to buy a nice, reliable laptop without spending too much, the M4 MacBook Air is most likely your safest choice.
But you (probably) know how I am.
I don’t wanna recommend you guys something without actually testing it myself. Which is why I’ve been using it alongside a $1,000 Windows laptop to find out if the M4 MacBook Air really is as good as everyone says it is. And after a lo…t of research, I found the Asus Zenbook S 14 OLED to be the closest M4 Air competitor in the Windows world. It’s quite a bit more expensive than the M4 Air in Nepal — retailing for NPR 232,900 —but bear with me here.
Apple M4 MacBook Air review: Specifications
Dimensions, Weight: 11.97 x 8.46 x 0.44 inches (W x D x H), 1.24 kg
Oh, and I’ll be comparing these two across a dozen different categories by the way to help you clearly understand which one’s better.
Design
1
Keyboard
1
Software
2
I/O
1
Trackpad
1
Gaming
1
Display
2
Webcam
1
Battery
2
Speakers
1
Performance
2
Value for money
2
Design and build
11.97 x 8.46 x 0.44 inches (W x D x H)
1.24 kg, All-metal build
So with all that sorted out… let me start with their design. And it’s gonna be a tie right away because both M4 Air and Zenbook S 14 have such an interesting approach here. The MacBook Air brings that classic all-metal design, while the ceramic + aluminum construction that the Zenbook uses feels just as premium and tough to me.
I like how they’re both so easy to carry around as well — and despite being so lightweight — I can comfortably lift them open with just one hand. Well… technically Asus did manage to make the Zenbook a bit lighter than the MacBook Air but you know what? These two feel practically the same whenever I have them in my backpack.
M4 MacBook Air
1
Zenbook S 14 OLED
1
The port selection on MacBook Airs has always been somewhat of a sore spot for me though. All you get is a MagSafe connector for charging, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a couple of Thunderbolt 4 / USB-C ports. So I almost always feel the need to travel with a USB hub with the MacBook Air in case I need to connect a pen drive. Or an external monitor through HDMI.
Ports
1 of 4
M4 MacBook Air (left)
M4 MacBook Air (right)
Zenbook S 14 OLED (left)
Zenbook S 14 OLED (right)
Whereas the Zenbook S 14 pretty much brings all the ports I could ask for. It also has a headphone jack and a couple of high-speed Thunderbolt 4 connections — but on top of that — there’s a full-sized HDMI 2.1 and a Type-A port as well with up to 10 Gbps data speeds.
So yeah… this round definitely goes to Asus.
M4 MacBook Air
1.5
Zenbook S 14 OLED
2
Display
13.6″ Liquid Retina IPS display
60Hz refresh rate, 100% DCI-P3 color gamut
500 nits brightness
And so does the next one ‘cause I wanna talk about their display next.
Now the M4 Air’s display is perfectly good for everything too. It gets quite bright, it looks plenty sharp, and it’s also super color-accurate with 100% sRGB colors. But put it next to the Zenbook’s gorgeous OLED panel and you’ll see exactly why this guy deserves the win. I mean… the perfect blacks and the perfect contrast ratio of an OLED display is something an IPS panel simply can’t compete with.
Left: Zenbook S 14 OLED | Right: M4 MacBook Air
And unlike the MacBook Air, you’re also looking at a 120Hz display here. So things like scrolling through websites or gaming are gonna feel a lot smoother on the Zenbook S 14 too. Compared to the M4 Air’s 60Hz refresh rate. Asus obviously didn’t compromise in terms of brightness numbers or color accuracy either so… you get what I mean.
M4 MacBook Air
2.5
Zenbook S 14 OLED
4
Speakers
Four-speaker system (2 tweeters + 2 woofers)
Support for Spatial Audio
I was quite surprised with how full and detailed its speakers sound as well.
They both have a great set of speakers while the Zenbook S 14 actually has noticeably better bass response than M4 Air. I remember saying how MacBooks have the best speaker on a laptop a while back but it seems some Windows manufacturers have managed to catch up to Apple. Nice!
M4 MacBook Air
3.5
Zenbook S 14 OLED
5
Keyboard
Full-size Magic Keyboard (backlit)
1mm key travel
Let’s talk about the keyboard now.
And I gotta say, both the MacBook Air and the Zenbook S 14 have awesome keyboards. They’re both backlit, low-travel keyboards with around 1mm of travel distance, so it all comes down to your personal preference before deciding on one of ‘em.
Keyboard
1 of 2
M4 MacBook Air
Zenbook S 14 OLED
The one on the MacBook feels just a tad bit stiffer and noisier for my taste versus the Zenbook — but like I just said — it’s an entirely subjective thing.
M4 MacBook Air
4.5
Zenbook S 14 OLED
6
Trackpad
Force Touch trackpad
I can’t really decide on one clear winner in terms of the trackpad either.
I’m probably supposed to say how the MacBook Air has a “technically superior” haptic trackpad while Asus has used a traditional mechanical one. Then again, I seriously doubt anyone will have a problem with the equally large and smooth touchpad on the Zenbook. And it even has a couple of fun and useful gestures to control volume, brightness, and stuff!
M4 MacBook Air
5.5
Zenbook S 14 OLED
7
Webcam
12MP Center Stage camera
Three-mic array with directional beamforming
Alright.
So taking a quick peek at the scoresheet, I know the MacBook Air doesn’t seem all that impressive so far but trust me… we still have a long way to go.
Webcam
1 of 2
M4 MacBook Air
Zenbook S 14 OLED
And when it comes to the webcam, the M4 Air clearly has a better camera than the Zenbook. This is actually among the few hardware upgrades in this year’s MacBook Air ‘cause Apple has borrowed the same 12MP ultrawide camera from its “Pro” MacBooks here. The details, exposure, and overall video quality itself are better on the M4 Air, while that upgraded camera also means two things:
It now supports “Center Stage” to keep you in the frame as you move around.
The Zenbook S 14 has a similar feature called “Automatic Framing”, although I found that it doesn’t quite work as well as it should.
Whereas Apple has made the most of that wider camera with something called “Desk View”. Which basically gives me an overhead view of my desk in case I need to show and tell something during video calls. I’ll admit that the image looks pretty distorted, but it does come in handy every now and then.
M4 MacBook Air
6.5
Zenbook S 14 OLED
7.5
Performance
Apple M4 chip (3nm)
10-core CPU, 8/10-core GPU
Up to 32GB unified memory, Up to 2TB SSD
Let’s… talk about performance now.
So the M4 chip on the MacBook Air now has a 10-core CPU (with 4 performance and 6 efficiency cores) and an 8-core GPU if you get the base variant. With 16GB of unified memory and 256GB storage.
On the other hand, the Zenbook S 14 has an Intel Core Ultra 7 256V “Lunar Lake” chip. I know that name sucks but Lunar Lake is easily Intel’s most ambitious lineup of mobile processors yet. And in a lot of ways, Intel has really tried to emulate Apple’s success by focusing on efficiency instead of just raw horsepower like always.
It’s built on TSMC’s 3nm process (like the M4 chip), Intel even got rid of hyperthreading for better efficiency, while this thing also has an integrated memory like Apple silicons. The storage is still upgradable here — unlike on the MacBooks — but yeah.
I’ll talk about whether or not Intel’s big bet on efficiency to improve battery life actually pays off in real-life usage in just a moment, but what you need to know right now is that M4 is simply way more powerful than this Intel chip. At literally every single thing.
It’s… not even a competition.
Be it in something like Cinebench 2024 which tests the chip’s CPU performance under full load or in Geekbench 6 that’s more like a general-purpose benchmark to test everyday work. And it’s not like Apple is ahead by a small margin either ‘cause I’m seeing nearly 40% better single-core scores and 20 – 40% better multi-core results.
CPU benchmarks
1 of 2
Cinebench 2024
Geekbench (CPU)
The M4 outclasses Intel’s 256V in GPU-based tests as well… and even in some productivity-based ones like Photoshop and Premiere Pro.
GPU, productivity benchmarks
1 of 5
Geekbench (GPU)
GFXBench
GravityMark
Pugetbench for Photoshop
Pugetbench for Premiere Pro
I also tried editing a simple 4K video on both of them. And although they managed to render the project at a surprisingly similar time, the actual editing experience was mu…ch smoother on the MacBook Air. Including things like scrubbing through the timeline in real-time and also when I was using multi-frame rendering on After Effects.
AI benchmarks
1 of 2
Geekbench AI
LM Studio
The MacBook Air is better-suited for AI tasks too… as you can see from this Geekbench AI test. And when I tried locally running Deepseek’s “R1” model with 7 billion parameters on these machines, the M4 Air had lower latency and it was much faster at generating tokens for the same prompt. Just… brilliant!
And then there are two important things about the MacBook’s performance that makes it all the more impressive compared to this Windows laptop:
Number 1, it is passively cooled. Which means there’s absolutely no fan noise here.
And number 2, the M4 Air retains its peak performance even on battery power. Unlike the Zenbook S 14 which loses a lot of its CPU performance when it’s not plugged in.
M4 MacBook Air
8.5
Zenbook S 14 OLED
8.5
Don’t get me wrong, the Zenbook is perfectly powerful enough on battery power for everyday work like checking email, browsing the web, editing documents, and stuff like that. And I must say that its fan noise is also whisper quiet in those situations.
The age-old problem with Windows machines
But anytime I do something a little more computationally demanding… like photo/video editing or running AI models locally, I need to either worry about sacrificing performance or worse fan noise and worse battery life on this guy.
It’s like I’m damned if I do and damned if I don’t!
Zenbook S 14 OLED benchmarks (plugged in vs on battery)
1 of 4
Cinebench 2024
Geekbench (CPU)
Pugetbench for Photoshop
Pugetbench for Premiere Pro
The Zenbook S 14’s only saving grace — as far as the performance is concerned — is that at least you can game on it. I doubt anyone’s buying a slim, lightweight laptop exclusively for gaming but hey… it’s possible here. And on my tests, I was easily getting around 100+ fps on CS2 and Valorant at medium to high settings at 1080p. Or around 50 fps on Cyberpunk 2077 with some upscaling magic.
I know gaming on a Mac has come a long way in the past couple of years — with more and more titles launching natively for Apple’s Arm-based systems — but Windows still has a massive head start in terms of gaming.
M4 MacBook Air
9
Zenbook S 14 OLED
9.5
Software
macOS Sequoia
As for the software experience itself, I’m gonna have to side with macOS as well.
It’s… so well designed, the animations are fantastic, and it just feels so reliable to me, you know? My one major complaint I used to have with macOS was that arranging multiple app windows always used to be a pain… but Apple has fixed that with macOS Sequoia. You also get a few “Apple Intelligence” features this time, and to me, those feel better-designed and easier too versus all the AI features on Windows 11.
M4 MacBook Air
11
Zenbook S 14 OLED
10.5
Battery
53.8 Wh Li-Po battery
Up to 70W fast charging support
Finally, I also found the battery life to be better on the MacBook Air.
It actually has a smaller 53.8 Wh battery compared to 72 Wh battery on the Zenbook S 14 but remember how I tested their performance on battery power? Yeah… I was also closely monitoring the battery level after every single test.
And by the end, the M4 Air and the Zenbook lost 30% and 36% charge, respectively. Even in my regular, everyday use, the MacBook Air would last longer by 10 – 15% every single day. So… even though Intel used every single trick up its sleeve to make Lunar Lake as power-efficient as possible, it seems that it’s still no match for Apple’s M4 chip.
M4 MacBook Air
13
Zenbook S 14 OLED
11.5
At least the Zenbook charges slightly faster so… that’s something I guess.
With the included 65W power brick taking the laptop from 1 – 100% in two hours, while the 30W adapter that Apple ships inside the box needs half an hour more to get the job done. You can speed up the charging time on the MacBook with a 35/70W brick — but of course — that’s gonna cost extra.
Which one’s the better value for money?
And considering everything, I’d say the M4 Air is a better value for money as well.
That level of performance, battery life, dependability, and everything else I get for just $1,000 here is simply remarkable. Not just that but MacBooks have a significantly better resale value than Windows laptops too. So if I want to sell it in the future for some reason, the M4 Air is not gonna depreciate by a lot like pretty much every other Windows machine. I can guarantee you that!
M4 MacBook Air
15
Zenbook S 14 OLED
12.5
Apple M4 MacBook Air review: Conclusion
Okay, so we’ve come to the end of this review.
And taking a final look at the scoresheet, we can see that the M4 MacBook Air takes a comfortable victory in this battle. The Zenbook S 14 does snatch a win at a couple of things like display, port selection, and gaming but besides that… the MacBook Air has a clean sweep at everything else. Especially when it comes to important stuff like performance, software experience, battery life, and overall value for money.
So yeah. If you’re looking to buy a premium, everyday laptop without spending too much, get the M4 MacBook Air. Don’t look at any Windows ultrabook unless macOS itself is a dealbreaker to you.
Our video review of Apple M4 MacBook Air is coming up pretty soon
Apple M4 MacBook Air review: Pros and Cons
• Literally everything else
• The port selection could’ve been better
• Just 256GB of base storage
• Unfortunately, memory and storage upgrades still cost an arm and a leg
After all these rumors and teasers, the Nothing Phone (2a) is finally official in Nepal. It brings a MediaTek Dimensity 7200 Pro chipset, a unique Glyph interface, dual 50MP cameras, and more. And it has received a price cut as well. So without further ado, let’s walk through the specs, features, and the latest official price of the Nothing Phone (2a) in Nepal in this article.
Nothing Phone (2a) Overview
Glyph Interface Stays
One of the signature design elements of the Nothing Phone lineup is the Glyph Interface. As such, the Phone (2a) has not ditched this signature look but it does undergo some changes. For starters, it is nowhere as pronounced as on the existing Nothing Phones. There are 3 (somewhat curved) strips around the camera module accompanied by a transparent design. In terms of ingress protection, it secures an IP54 rating.
Display
As for the display, the Nothing Phone (2a) sports a 6.7-inch AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate. This FHD+ display bears a 394 PPI density, 10-bit colors, and 1300 nits of peak brightness.
Meanwhile, read all the prices and specs of Nothing products here
Performance and Storage
Under the hood, this smartphone features MediaTek’s Dimensity 7200 Pro SoC on the Nothing Phone (2a). It’s an octa-core processor built on TSMC’s 2nd gen 4nm node featuring 2 Cortex A715 prime cores (@2.8GHz) and 6 Cortex A510 secondary cores (@2.0 GHz).
Likewise, the Pro moniker stands for the joint collaboration with Mediatek engineers for better software and hardware integration. On the GPU side, there’s Arm Mali-G610 MC4 and HyperEngine 5.0 for handling graphical workloads. To keep the thermals in check, Nothing has provided an advanced liquid cooling system.
And if you were wondering, the chipset scores somewhere over 700,000 on the AnTuTu Benchmark, falling a bit shy from the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 SoC from Qualcomm, which scores around 800,000.
Software-wise, the Phone (2a) boots on Nothing OS 2.5 built on top of Android 14. And the company is promising 3 years of major OS updates and 4 years of security updates. Memory-wise, it comes with 12GB RAM + 8GB virtual RAM and 128/256GB of internal storage.
In terms of optics, you get a 50MP main camera of a 1/1.15 inch sensor with OIS coupled with a 50MP ultrawide camera of a 1/2.76″ sensor size, which is the same one from the Phone (2). The main camera supports video shooting up to 4K@30 fps. Upfront, you get a 32MP selfie shooter.
Battery, Charging, and Others
Fueling the Nothing Phone (2a) is a 5000mAh battery, accompanied by 45W of fast charging. Talking of the connectivity options here, you get 5G, WiFi 6, Bluetooth 5.3, GPS, NFC, and a USB Type-C 2.0 port. Furthermore, there is an indisplay fingerprint scanner for biometrics security.
Nothing Phone (2a) Price in Nepal and Availability
The latest official price of Nothing Phone (2a) in Nepal is NPR 45,999 for the base 8/128GB. Meanwhile, the top-end 12/256GB cue costs NPR 52,999. You can purchase this phone from the Hukut Store starting from Rs. 39,999.
Sony has unveiled the latest addition to its wireless earbud lineup, the WF-C710N, which offers improved features and improved noise cancellation. This article will discuss everything about the latest Sony WF-C710N, including its expected price in Nepal, specifications, and availability.
Sony WF-C710N Overview
Design and Features
The Sony WF-C710N earbuds feature improved active noise cancellation (ANC) with dual microphones per earbud. The earbuds are designed to reduce background noise effectively, offering a better listening experience. Additionally, they support a battery life of up to 8.5 hours with ANC on, and a total of 30 hours with the charging case. They are available in four colors: Black, White, Pink, and the unique transparent Glass Blue.
Connectivity and controls
The earbuds come with Bluetooth 5.3 and multipoint connectivity, allowing users to connect to multiple devices at the same time. They also feature touch controls, making the earbuds more user-friendly. In addition, a quick charge option provides 1 hour of playback from just 5 minutes of charging.
The WF-C710N earbuds include in-ear detection, which automatically pauses the music when an earbud is removed and resumes playback when replaced. The earbuds also feature an IPX4 water resistance rating, making them suitable for light rain or sweat during workouts. Furthermore, they are equipped with Sony’s Digital Sound Enhancement Engine (DSEE) for improved audio quality.
Sony WF-C710N Specifications
Battery Life: 8.5 hours with ANC on, 30 hours with the charging case
Noise Cancellation: Improved ANC with dual microphones per earbud
Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.3, multipoint connectivity
Additional Features: Digital Sound Enhancement Engine (DSEE), in-ear detection
Sony WF-C710N Price in Nepal and Availability
The Sony WF-C710N is priced at $119.99 in the US, which translates to approximately NPR 16,000 in Nepal. However, the expected price in Nepal could be higher due to import costs and other factors.
Device Name
Price in the US (Official)
Price in Nepal (Expected)
Sony WF-C710N
$119.99
NPR 19,200
Meanwhile, check out our review of the Nothing Phone (3a)
The Lava Shark has launched with solid features for a budget-friendly price. It offers a large display, a capable camera setup, and the latest Android version. This article will discuss everything about the latest Lava Shark, including its price in Nepal, specifications, and availability.
Lava Shark Overview
Display and Design
The Lava Shark comes with a 6.67-inch LCD. It offers HD+ resolution with a 120Hz refresh rate for smooth visuals. The design is sleek and available in two colors: Titanium Gold and Stealth Black.
Processor and Performance
Under the hood, the Lava Shark is powered by the Unisoc T606 processor. It features 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, which can be expanded via a microSD card. It runs on Android 14, offering the latest features. For security, the device is equipped with a side-mounted fingerprint scanner for easy and secure access.
The smartphone features a 50MP main camera for capturing high-quality photos. It is equipped with a 5,000mAh battery, supporting 18W fast charging for quicker power-ups.
Lava Shark Specifications
Display: 6.67-inch LCD, HD+, 120Hz
Processor: Unisoc T606
RAM: 4GB
Storage: 64GB (expandable via microSD)
Rear Camera: 50MP
¨Battery: 5,000mAh, 18W charging
Operating System: Android 14
Security: Side-mounted fingerprint scanner
Colors: Titanium Gold, Stealth Black
Lava Shark Price in Nepal and Availability
The Lava Shark is priced at INR 6,999 in India. It is expected to be available in Nepal for no less than NPR 11,000.
Device Name
Price in India (Official)
Price in Nepal (Expected)
Lava Shark
INR 6,999 ($82)
NPR 11,000
Meanwhile, check out our review of the Nothing Phone 3a
Vivo’s most expensive phone, the X200 Pro, was just launched in Nepal recently. That phone created a lot of global hype, especially because of its Zeiss camera. And now, in this more affordable model—the Vivo V50—Vivo has also collaborated with Zeiss, just like in the X200 Pro. Because of that, there’s been a lot of buzz in the market about this phone’s camera capabilities. So, I tested the phone myself, and in this article review, I’ll tell you everything about the latest Vivo V50!
The price for the 12GB + 256GB variant is NPR 68,000. I wouldn’t call this the best value-for-money pricing—it feels about NPR 5,000 more expensive than it should be. That said, Vivo is giving free TWS earbuds, so there’s that. But still, I feel the pricing could have been slightly better. Right now, most brands have increased their prices because almost all of them are offering 0% EMI. You can also buy the Vivo V50 on 0% EMI.
The best thing about this phone is definitely its camera, especially the portraits it captures. There’s no telephoto lens, but it does have a 50MP primary and a 50MP ultra-wide camera at the back. However, Vivo has cleverly provided different focal length options, meaning you can take portraits at 1x, 1.5x, 2x, or 3x zoom. The subject focus is excellent, and while the output is slightly punchy, it’s perfect for social media.
Portrait
1 of 6
Additionally, Vivo has included different bokeh effects, including a “wedding effect” frame. For low-light shots, there’s a ring light as well. These features will appeal to many users.
Vivo is also great at enhancing skin tones, making selfies look pleasing. There’s even a wide-angle selfie option, which is nice!
Selfie
1 of 4
Vivo V50 Selfie
The main camera takes good photos as well. Just like in the expensive Vivo X200 Pro, you get Zeiss Natural and Zeiss Vivid modes, so you can choose the color reproduction you prefer.
Daylight
1 of 10
Most photos from the main camera look great, though sometimes it over-brightens the images. But overall, the photos are good, so no major issues. Ultra-wide shots also turn out well, but the dynamic range is slightly weaker compared to the main camera.
Daytime
1 of 5
At night, the phone captures bright images, often eliminating the need for night mode.
Night
1 of 8
Video
The Vivo V50 doesn’t support 4K 60fps recording, with video capture limited to 30fps. Even at 30fps, I found that the stabilization isn’t the best. Skin tones in videos also look somewhat processed. The selfie camera can record up to 4K 30fps, but once again, the stabilization isn’t great It’s a great phone for photography, but I feel the video quality could have been better.
Design & Battery
6000 mAh
IP68/IP69
Diamond Shield glass
Two things I absolutely love about this phone are: the design and its battery life
Design
1 of 2
Despite having a slim body, it packs a 6,000mAh battery with impressive endurance—it easily provides 8 hours of screen-on time.
Charging is fast too, taking less than an hour to fully charge. These days, getting a charger inside the box is a big deal, so good job, Vivo!
The phone has a glass back and comes in two beautiful colors. It feels premium in hand—curved, not too heavy, but with a good heft. Vivo hasn’t disclosed the back glass protection, but the front has its proprietary Diamond Shield glass.
The good news is that this phone has both IP68 and IP69 ratings, meaning it’s highly durable. You can even take it into the swimming pool without worry!
Display
6.77-inch AMOLED display, 1300 nits
Display
1 of 2
The Vivo V50 comes with a 6.77-inch AMOLED display, offering 1300 nits of brightness in auto mode for clear outdoor visibility. When watching HDR content, the brightness goes up to 4500 nits, making the viewing experience even better. I also found that Netflix and other platforms support HDR, but there’s a small issue—4K 60fps HDR videos occasionally stutter. Hopefully, a future update will fix this bug.
Software & Performance
Android 15 with Funtouch OS
Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
Vivo has promised 3 years of OS updates and 4 years of security updates. While this isn’t as good as Samsung, you’ll still get updates up to Android 18. Out of the box, the phone runs on Android 15 with Funtouch OS.
Personally, I prefer Samsung, Nothing, or OnePlus software experiences—they feel cleaner and more modern. I think Funtouch OS could use some improvements in its look and feel. Plus, this phone comes with some unnecessary pre-installed apps that you’ll need to uninstall.
AI features are present, including Circle to Search, AI Transcribe, and AI Eraser, all of which work well. The Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 processor handles these AI tasks smoothly.
Now, I wouldn’t call the Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 a gaming chipset, but you can still get a decent gaming experience. In our tests, PUBG and Genshin Impact ran well with good FPS. If you want us to test any other heavy game, let us know in the comments!
One funny thing is that Vivo has been using this same Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 for three generations now—it was in the V30, V40, and now V50. It almost feels like Vivo bulk-bought these chips in advance!
Jokes aside, if Vivo had used the Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 or the Dimensity 8350, this phone would have been much more competitive at its price.
Vivo V50 Review: Pros and Cons
Pros
Cons
Bright and vibrant display
Lacks a telephoto camera
Excellent portrait photography
–
Long battery life with fast charging
–
Durable design with water resistance
UI has some bloatware
Useful AI features
Reused chipset from previous models
Vivo V50 Review: Conclusion
To wrap things up—Vivo always focuses on camera and design, and in those areas, this phone is excellent. For photography, it’s probably one of the best options at this price.
I just wish the performance was slightly better—it would have made for a more well-rounded package. But even now, the performance is decent.
So, if you’re looking for a great-looking phone with an excellent camera, the Vivo V50 is a solid choice for you.
ZTE Blade A35e has been launched in the Nepali market as the cheapest offering from the brand. This smartphone comes with a 6.5-inch LCD+ screen and Unisoc SC98631A chipset. In this article, we will discuss the specifications of ZTE Blade A35e, including its official price in Nepal.
ZTE Blade A35e Overview
Design and Display
The ZTE Blade A35e just like other devices from the Blade series has a sleek and simple design. Its back features a unique pill-shaped camera setup with two lenses. Likewise, the device measures 75.7 x 164.0 x 8.5 mm and weighs just 115 grams, which makes this device a lightweight and easy to handle.
In the front, the phone is equipped with a 6.5-inch LCD+ screen that offers a resolution of 1280 x 576 pixels. While the bezels at the bottom are slightly thicker the sides are well-balanced.
Performance and Battery
Inside, the ZTE Blade A35e features an octa-core Unisoc SC98631A chipset. This processor has 4 Cortex A55 cores running at 1.6GHz and 4 Cortex A55 cores running at 1.2GHz, ensuring a smooth experience for basic tasks. For graphics, it uses the PowerVR GE8322.
On the software side, the phone runs Android 14 (Go edition) which provides a more efficient experience for entry-level users. Moreover, the device comes with 2GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage that you can expand up to 128GB via a microSD card.
The 5000 mAh battery ensures long-lasting use which is perfect for a full day of regular activity. It also supports USB-C charging, which is faster and more convenient than older charging ports.
In terms of cameras, the ZTE Blade A35e features a single 8MP rear camera with autofocus and an LED flash. This setup can record 1080p videos at 30fps. Furthermore, on front camera is a 5MP shooter good for selfies and video calls.
As for connectivity, the device supports 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.2, and FM radio. The inclusion of a 3.5mm headphone jack is a nice touch, especially since many newer devices have removed it.
ZTE Blade A35e Specifications
Dimension: 75.7 x 164.0 x 8.5 mm
Display: 6.5-inch LCD+ screen, 1280 x 576 pixels
Chipset: Unisoc SC98631A
Graphics: PowerVR GE8322
OS: Android 14 (Go edition)
RAM: 2GB
Storage: 64GB (expandable up to 128GB via microSD)
Rear Camera: 8MP, autofocus, LED flash, 1080p video recording at 30fps
Front Camera: 5MP
Battery: 5000 mAh, USB-C charging
Connectivity: 2.4GHz Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 4.2, FM radio
Audio: 3.5mm headphone jack
Colors: Grey, Mint Green
ZTE Blade A35e Price in Nepal and Availability
The ZTE Blade A35e is priced at NPR 10,499 for the 2GB/64GB variant in Nepal. You can purchase it through Hukut.
In this review, I’ll be sharing my thoughts on the Motorola Moto G45, a phone I’ve been using for a week now. On paper, it looks like a solid option under NPR 25,000, but does it truly live up to expectations in real life? Let’s find out in this review
An unnecessary price discrimination?
Before we go into the specifications, I want to bring up the fact that it’s priced around INR 12,000 in India. Which converts to around NPR 20,000. But here in Nepal, it costs 25% more. So my big question is if Nepali buyers can overlook this price bump because of the phone’s features, or is this going to be a letdown? We’ll see.
Also, to give you a fair comparison, I’ve been using the Redmi Note 14 4G alongside the Moto G45, which falls within the same price range.
Moto G45 5G review: Specifications
Design and Build: 162.7 x 74.64 x 8.03mm, 183 gm, IP52 rating
Glass front, plastic frame, silicone polymer (eco-leather) back
IP52 dust/spill resistant
Okay. What I like the most about the Moto G45 is its design, which really captures the essence of recent Motorola phones like the Edge 50 and the Fusion series. The unit I’m reviewing is the “Brilliant Blue” finish, which has this smooth vegan leather finish that feels premium to the touch.
In terms of handling, I found the Moto G45 to be much lighter and more comfortable to hold than the Redmi Note 14 4G.
For a regular iPhone 12 Pro Max user like me who has the habit of carrying a bulky phone, holding the Moto G45 made me double-check my pocket. Lol! The Moto G45 also comes with an IP52 rating, which means it can handle a little dust and survive accidental splashes when you’re caught in light rain or accidentally spill your drink onto the phone.
Display
6.5-inch IPS LCD with HD (720 x 1600) resolution
120Hz refresh rate, 20:9 aspect ratio
Corning Gorilla Glass 3
The display is where I was really left scratching my head. It’s got a 6.5-inch HD+ IPS LCD screen, and to be honest, it feels a bit like a letdown. If you’re looking for something vibrant, you’re better off looking elsewhere with an AMOLED panel. Take the Redmi Note 14 4G I’m using alongside this Moto, for example.
On top of that, this display doesn’t support HDR. Watching YouTube videos on it felt a little… meh. Plus, the brightness levels are not that impressive either. On sunny days, I had to cover the screen with my hands to get a good look at my incoming messages or the photos I’d take.
Thank goodness for the 120Hz refresh rate that made my TikTok and Facebook scrolling sessions super smooth! If Moto had skipped this, I might’ve had a few words to say… but hey, we’re all good! As for the chin, yeah it’s a bit on the thicker side… although it didn’t bother me much during daily use.
Once you get into the flow, you hardly notice it! I mean, come on, it’s a budget phone after all! Also folks, we get a Corning Gorilla Glass 3 for protection on the good side. So yeah, the display is kind of a mixed bag here.
After testing the Moto G45 5G for this review, I found that its gaming performance is decent but varies significantly between different games. This phone is powered by Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 chip, and in Mobile Legends, it delivers smooth gameplay with a consistent 60 fps. However, when switching to PUBG Mobile, I could only play it at a not-so-enjoyable 40 fps.
Its temperatures are perfectly fine though. And I only ever noticed the Moto G45 hitting around 35°C during my gaming sessions.
Gaming on Moto G45
1 of 2
PUBG
Mobile Legends
On the software side, I recently got the latest Android 15 update on my review unit of the Moto G45. Unlike Xiaomi’s HyperOS 1.0 on the Redmi Note 14 4G that comes with a lot of bloatware and ads, Motorola keeps things clean with a good Android experience free from unnecessary pre-installed apps.
And in terms of updates, Motorola has only promised a single OS upgrade and three years of os security updates. Which means… with the Android 15 update that I have already received, I only have security patches to look forward to on this thing. Sadly, no more version upgrades!
Cameras
Dual camera setup at the back
(50MP main, 2MP macro)
16MP selfie camera (hole-punch cutout)
Alright, let’s talk cameras! I’ve been messing around with the Moto G45 and the Redmi Note 14 4G, snapping pics left and right, and here’s what I think.
Daylight images
In good lighting, the Moto G45 is umm… good. That 50MP main camera gives me punchy, contrasty, and warm shots that look great considering everything.
1 of 8
Moto
Redmi
Moto
Redmi
Moto
Redmi
Moto
Redmi
I took some pictures with the Redmi too, and compared to the G45, I noticed how its colors looked a bit… washed out. And while neither phone has an ultra-wide lens, the Note 14 4G’s main camera does have a slightly wider field of view.
Lowlight images
The results completely flip when it gets dark. Redmi’s night shots have a yellowish tint and arguably nicer contrast, and they look punchy and lively to me. While Moto G45’s images kinda fell flat. But it depends more on the preference.
1 of 6
Moto
Redmi
Moto
Redmi
Moto
Redmi
Portraits
In the portrait mode, Moto handles colors way better, keeping things natural and balanced. Redmi Note 14 4G, on the other hand, sometimes overexposes the face. Making it look too bright and washed out.
1 of 4
Moto
Redmi
Moto
Redmi
Selfies
Both phones do a solid job in the selfie part! Moto gives you a natural skin tone with a bit of smoothing. Kinda like a beauty filter that’s not too aggressive.
1 of 4
Moto
Redmi
Moto
Redmi
Redmi sometimes brightens up the face, which looks great in some cases but a little too much in others. Either way, both are selfie-approved from little ol’ me!
Videos
As for videos, you can only shoot up to 1080p 30 fps from both of them. And here, the Note 14 4G once again has a wider field of view and better stabilization, making it the clear winner.
Battery and charging
5000 mAh battery
18W charging (18W adapter inside the box)
The Moto G45 gives you a solid full day of use unless you’re glued to your phone 24/7 (we’ve all been there). It took me about two hours to charge it fully with the 18W charger that came in the box. Not the fastest, but it gets the job done.
Moto G45 review: Conclusion
Alright.
So even though Motorola Nepal could’ve done a better job in terms of pricing, I think the Moto G45 is a solid pick under NPR 25,000. It’s lightweight, smooth to use (thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate), and its battery lasts all day. The G45’s cameras are also pretty nice, although I really wish Motorola had gone with an AMOLED display here.
ZTE has launched the ZTE Blade A75 in Nepal as a budget-friendly device. This smartphone comes with a Unisoc T760 chipset and a 50MP main camera. In this article, we will discuss the ZTE Blade A75 including its specifications and price in Nepal.
ZTE Blade A75 Overview
Design and Display
The ZTE Blade A75 has a simple and sleek design with a monotone finish and a 163.6 x 74.9 x 8.6mm dimension. On the back, there’s a circular camera setup with two cameras and a flash.
The front has a 6.6-inch IPS LCD that supports a 90Hz refresh rate and a resolution of 720 x 1612 pixels. The bezels at the bottom are noticeable while the sides are fairly slim. For security the phone includes a fingerprint sensor. It comes in Black and Mint Green colors.
Performance and Battery
Under the hood, the ZTE Blade A75 features a Unisoc T606 chipset built on a 12nm process. This octa-core processor includes 2 Cortex A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and 6 Cortex A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz. The Mali-G57 handles the graphics.
The phone runs on Android 13, which is a bit behind since newer models are using Android 15. In fact, the ZTE Blade A55, which costs less than the Blade A75 features Android 14 (Go edition). For storage, it has 4GB of RAM and 256GB of internal storage, which is fast thanks to the UFS 3.1 technology. The battery is a 5,000mAh unit and depending on the region it can support either 10W or 18W charging.
On the front, the ZTE Blade A75 comes with a dual-camera setup on the back featuring a 50MP main camera and a 2MP secondary camera. For selfies, there’s an 8MP front camera.
Connectivity options include Bluetooth 5.2, Wi-Fi 5, and a USB Type-C 2.0 port. For audio, the phone retains a 3.5mm headphone jack which is great for those who prefer wired headphones.
![Nothing Phone 2a Price in Nepal [Updated]](https://cdn.gadgetbytenepal.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/Nothing-Phone-2a-Price-in-Nepal.jpg "Nothing Phone 2a Price in Nepal [Updated]")
