Samsung Ad
Home Blog Page 553

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (Fan Edition) Review: Great Value!

Pratima Adhikari
-
0
Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (Fan Edition) Review: Great Value!

So today I have got the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (Fan Edition) with me in for review, which was launched like a month ago. Samsung says it’s the company’s flagship phone for the fans. From the top of the line hardware to flagship features like the IP rating and wireless charging, the S20 FE has it all—although there are definitely some compromises to keep the price in check.

Regardless, when it was initially announced, I thought it would be more like a lite version of the S20 series, similar to last year’s S10 Lite. But, it’s not. As a matter of fact, Samsung says the main reason for the introduction of the S20 FE was to create a cheaper flagship for people not willing to spend over a thousand dollars amidst the current economic downturn because of Covid 19, which is something I really appreciate. Keeping the appreciation aside, does this cheaper Samsung flagship keep up with the “Fan Edition” tag? Let’s dig deeper to find out in this review of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE (Fan Edition)!

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Specifications:

  • Body: 6.29 x 2.93 x 0.33-inches, 190gm
  • Display: 6.5-inches Super AMOLED panel, Corning Gorilla Glass 3, 120Hz Refresh Rate, 240Hz Touch Sampling Rate, 84.8% screen-to-body ratio, 407 PPI, Always-on Display (AoD), IP68 dust/water resistance
  • Resolution: FHD+ (2400 x 1080 pixels), 20:9 aspect ratio
  • Chipset: 5G: Snapdragon 865, 4G: Exynos 990 | 7nm+ mobile platform
  • CPU:
    • 5G: Octa-core (1×2.84 GHz Kryo 585 & 3×2.42 GHz Kryo 585 & 4×1.8 GHz Kryo 585)
    • 4G: Octa-core (2×2.73 GHz Mongoose M5 & 2×2.50 GHz Cortex-A76 & 4×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
  • GPU: 5G: Adreno 650 | 4G: Mali-G77 MP11
  • RAM: 6/8GB LPDDR5 RAM
  • Storage: 128/256GB UFS 3.1 internal storage (expandable)
  • Software & UI: One UI 2.5 on top of Android 10
  • Rear Camera: Triple-camera;
    – 12MP, f/1.8 primary lens, Dual Pixel PDAF, OIS
    – 12MP, f/2.2 ultra-wide lens, 123° FOV
    – 8MP, f/2.4 telephoto lens, 3x optical zoom
    – LED flash
  • Front Camera: 32MP, f/2.2 lens (punch-hole)
  • Security: In-display Fingerprint Scanner (optical)
  • Audio: Stereo speakers, No headphone jack
  • Connectivity: Hybrid Dual-SIM (Nano), WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax, Bluetooth 5.0, GPS / A-GPS / Glonass / BDS / Galileo, USB Type-C, 4G LTE/5G
  • Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Barometer
  • Battery: 4500mAh with 25W wired, 15W wireless, 4.5W reverse-wireless charging
  • Colors: Cloud-Lavender, Mint, Navy, White, Red, Orange
  • Price in Nepal: Rs. 69,999 (4G, 8/128GB)

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Review:

Design & Build

  • Aluminum frame, plastic back
  • IP68 dust/water resistance

Alright, let’s address the elephant in the room first. Yes, plastic backs on flagship phones are a thing now, all thanks to Samsung. It started with the Galaxy Note 20 and then got handed over to the S20 FE. It might sound like I am complaining, but trust me I’m not! Certainly, when you hear plastic you assume the device to feel flimsy and cheap. But this one’s nothing of that sort. In fact, it has a very good feel and the right kind of heft.

Galaxy S20 FE - Design [1]

Also, what makes me like this design, even more, is that it does not register scratches or fingerprint smudges as easily as glass backs do. I’ve used this phone for more than a month without a cover and it still looks good as new. But, I do encourage you to get a back cover or a skin since plastic might get scratched or washed out over time.

Similarly, the front of it only has the Gorilla Glass 3 protection, which isn’t as scratch and drop resistant as the latest Gorilla Glass Victus or the Gorilla Glass 6 we’ve seen on Samsung’s recent flagship phones. So, if you are one of the careless ones like me, you’d better get a good screen protector. The frames are, however, made of aluminum just like the S20+.

Plus, I think Samsung has finally got the color availability right. The phone is available in multiple color options, which isn’t something new for them. But this time, Samsung is making all these colors available in the majority of the markets.

Display

  • 6.5-inches FHD+ Super AMOLED panel (flat)
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • 120Hz refresh rate, 240Hz touch sampling rate

Moving on to the display, it is a classic Samsung Super AMOLED panel, so no doubt it’s one of the best you smartphone screen you could lay your eyes on. Still, it doesn’t have a sharper QHD resolution like the S20+, but honestly, I’ve never practically turned that option on in any of the Samsung flagships I’ve ever used.

Galaxy S20 FE, S20+
Left: S20 FE | Right: S20+

The important thing about this display is it refreshes at 120Hz which makes for a super smooth experience. I think this feature alone has made the $1000 Galaxy Note 20 look pale and unjustifiably priced in comparison. The bezels on the other hand are slightly pronounced as opposed to what we usually see on flagship offerings from Samsung. Likewise, the gentle curves are gone too and you get this super flat display, which I am okay with actually!

The issue with S20 FE’s display

However, there are some underlying issues at times with the S20 FE’s display. For starters, scrolling would be jittery all of a sudden and I even experienced some ghost touches. I turned to the community to check if others were going through the same thing and turns out this was the issue faced by many others too.

Samsung, in its October update, did fix the issue to some extent but it is not completely gone. In my opinion, this looks more like a software issue rather than hardware and I hope Samsung fixes it ASAP.

Optical in-display fingerprint sensor

On a different note, this display houses an in-display fingerprint sensor—not the ultrasonic kind like in the company’s premium “S” and “Note” series of phones, but the standard optical one. Nonetheless, it works flawlessly. I was a little worried that it would be slower just like the ones in Samsung’s A-series phones, but it’s not like that at all.

Galaxy S20 FE - Display [1]

The brightness of this display is also very good, not as good as the Note 20 Ultra but will get you through even in a sunny environment. The tiny punch hole up top is non-obtrusive and its diameter is in fact smaller than the one on the Note 20 Ultra.

Performance

  • Two variants: 4G (Global, including Nepal), 5G (US, S. Korea)
  • 4G: Octa-core Samsung Exynos 990 SoC (7nm+)
  • 6/8GB LPDDR5 RAM with upto 256GB UFS 3.1 storage (expandable)

Anyway, let me talk about the most criticized feature of the S20 FE, which is the Exynos 990 chipset. Really makes me wonder: why did Samsung include the most criticized feature of the Galaxy S20 and the Note 20 Ultra on a device that is meant for the FANS?

Not that the Exynos 990 is a bad chipset or anything, it’s still a powerful chipset but it certainly is not in the same league with its direct Snapdragon counterpart. And since I am also using the OnePlus 8T right now, which retails at the same price, it’s not difficult to point which one’s better in terms of sheer performance. Moreover, the Exynos 990 is not only inferior to the Snapdragon 865 when it comes to performance, but it is more battery hungry and toastier too.

Anyways, all the negativity aside, Samsung’s upcoming Exynos 1080, 2100 are the real deal. If the early leaks are to be believed, these silicons can reportedly outperform the next-gen SoCs from Qualcomm, namely the Snapdragon 875. In terms of memory, the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE has DDR5 RAM and UFS 3.0 storage. The RAM options are either 6 or 8GB, whereas storage is either 128 or 256GB.

Galaxy S20 FE - Design [2]

Moving on, with my real-life usage, the experience on this phone has been buttery smooth. There’s not a hint of lag, apps open fast, and multitasking is a breeze. But again, I am using the Oneplus 8T right now, and it definitely feels more optimized and faster than the FE.

Gaming

Similarly, gaming, especially those high demanding titles, are inferior to that of the OnePlus 8T. For instance, the max you can go to PUBG is smooth graphics and extreme frame rates with a little bit of choppiness here and there. With the Oneplus 8T, there’s an exclusive 90 fps mode as well, which is much smoother.

About the heating, I’ve noticed that the S20 FE does not heat up easily like the S20+ which is something I really appreciate because shooting 4K videos and heavy gaming on the S20+ would result in the phone getting considerably warm after a while. So, Samsung has improved the thermals on the FE, which is great.

Software

  • One UI 2.5 on top of Android 10

Galaxy S20 FE - Software

Talking about the software, the phone runs on Android 10 with One UI 2.5 out-of-the-box. It also includes the support for Samsung DeX, which I particularly don’t find that useful, but some of you might. However, a little sad news is that the S20 FE is not up for One UI 3.0 Beta testing as other S20 Flagships yet, although it is sure to receive Android 11 any day now.

Samsung has also promised to give 3 years of OS upgrade on the S20 FE. Its follow up on monthly security updates has also been really good until now. As of now, my phone runs on October’s security patch and I should be receiving the November patch anytime soon.

Cameras

  • Triple-cameras at the back
  • (12MP primary, 12MP ultrawide, 8MP telephoto)
  • 32MP front-facing camera inside the punch-hole cutout

S20 Fan Edition features the same 12MP primary and ultrawide angle lens as the S20+, followed by a new 8MP Telephoto lens capable of 3x optical zoom. As expected, this phone has stellar camera capabilities for photos, and even in regards to videos, you can go upto 4k 60fps with OIS—both from the front and back cameras without any compromises on the quality as compared to the S20+.

Normal Images

In fact, in many cases, the S20+ overcompensates the colors while the FE tones it down and makes the image more natural.

Details, dynamic range, and everything else looks the same in both the phones, so I could not be happier with the cameras on the S20 FE.

Portrait Images

S20 FE does not shoot portraits with the Telephoto lens like the S20+ but rather uses the primary lens. The edge detection is slightly flawed as you can see in these pictures, but overall they are not bad.

Although, I would go for the portraits of the S20+ as the subjects look more pronounced in it and the depth looks more natural.

Telephoto Images

The 8MP Telephoto zoom lens, however, gives you slightly better results than the S20+ with its 3x Optical zoom capability as opposed to the 3X hybrid zoom on the S20+.

Ultrawide Images

The ultra-wide-angle images equally impress with outstanding colors and details.

As you can see from this comparison, both the S20+ and FE are nearly identical.

Nighttime Images

Even the night time shots from the FE are similar to the S20+ in both normal and night mode.

But, nighttime images in ultra-wide mode are riddled with grains although you can toggle to night mode to compensate for the noise and exposure management to some extent.

Also, while shooting in night mode, the camera takes over 5 sec to process the image, which I think Samsung needs to improve upon.

Videos

About the videos, as mentioned earlier, you can record upto 4k 60fps with full Optical image stabilization from the main lens. And since it doesn’t have a 64MP telephoto lens as the S20+, there is no 8k shooting with the FE.

You can shoot stabilized videos in the Ultra-wide angle mode too but, like the S20+, there’s no 60fps mode here. Likewise, the slow-mo and super slow-mo video modes are always fun to play around with.

Selfie Images

During my review, the selfie camera of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, unfortunately, didn’t meet my expectation. It’s a 32MP shooter as opposed to the 10MP one on the S20+.

But even with the higher resolution, it’s not as good as its flagship sibling which is clearly noticed in these pictures here. To make matters clearer, the S20 FE’s selfies are a kind of Galaxy A71-ish rather than a flagship level.

Overall, though, I am really satisfied with the cameras of the S20 FE. Samsung’s decision to not include a gimmicky macro or depth camera is spot on, unlike its closest competitors the Oneplus 8T—and frankly should be a lesson to all the smartphone manufacturers who purposefully sham their high-end devices with unworthy image sensors.

Battery

  • 4500mAh battery with 25W wired charging
  • Only a 15W charger provided inside the box
  • 15W wireless and 4.5W reverse wireless charging

In regards to the battery life, the S20 FE has sort of met my expectations. I used this phone with the 120Hz refresh rate and the always-on display turned ON, and with that, I strictly got a days’ battery life. Now, I am someone who is into watching Netflix and Amazon Prime Video at almost every chance I get. And with all the social media, texting, clicking pictures and videos that I do all day, I would have to charge the phone as I reach home at around 8 PM.

Galaxy S20 FE - Display [2]

Talking about charging, you don’t get a faster 25W charger inside the box like the S20+ although it does support it. Obviously, Samsung had to make some compromises to achieve the lower price, such as skimping on accessories like chargers and earphones inside the box.

But unlike Apple, Samsung has been generous enough to include a 15-watt fast charger inside the box, which takes around an hour and a half to get the phone completely juiced up. So, if slow charging frustrates you as it does to me, you’re gonna have to cash-in around $30 dollars and get a genuine 25-watt fast charger.

Extras

As for other things, the Galaxy S20 FE has 15W wireless charging support, IP68 rating, and stereo speakers to give you a more flagship experience. But hold on, mark that these speakers are not true stereo as the earpiece serves as a secondary channel, but they do an amazing job. It produces balanced and rich output and there is Dolby Atmos support like the S20+.

Conclusion

So, that was all about my experience with the Galaxy S20 FE. Do I recommend this phone? Definitely! It is one of the best value flagships at the moment and If you are in the market for a new smartphone right now, and don’t want to cash in top dollars, the S20 FE would be an ideal choice.

In fact, it sits above the Xiaomi Mi 10T Pro and the OnePlus 8T in my rank for the best value flagship phone right now. Moreover, it’s not even a debate, or a contest if your region ships the Snapdragon variant for the phone.

And with Samsung’s brand recognition and unmatched distribution and availability, I think this phone will definitely take some of the market shares of the OnePlus 8T. Plus, Samsung has already confirmed that it’s going to be releasing the Fan Edition version of the S series every year. So, it’s going to be an interesting battle in the coming days too.

  • Watch our video review of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE.

Samsung Galaxy S20 FE Review: Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Terrific value for money—an easy recommendation
  • Impressively well-built for a phone with a plastic back
  • Flat Super AMOLED display is stunning
  • Flagship-grade performance
  • Excellent camera capabilities
  • Decent battery life

Cons:

  • Should’ve gone with the SD865 in all variants
  • The selfie camera isn’t that great
  • No 25W charger inside the box

Realme Watch Review: An Unpolished First-Gen Smartwatch

Pratima Adhikari
-
1
Realme Watch Review: An Unpolished First-Gen Smartwatch

Realme launched its first-ever smartwatch back in May and it has been with me for more time than I can remember—most likely around 3 months; yeah, that adds up. So, in this review, I will be sharing with you my experience with the Realme Watch and what I think Realme (almost desperately) needs to improve in its next-generation smartwatches. Let’s begin!

Realme Watch Specifications:

  • Body: 1.44W x 0.46H x 10.08L-inches, 31grams (w/ strap)
  • Display: 1.4-inches TFT LCD panel; Gorilla Glass 3, 262K colors, 380 nits
  • Design: Polycarbonate body, Silicon wrist band (20mm)
  • Resolution: 320 x 320 pixels
  • Water Resistance Level: IP68 rating (1.5 meters)
  • Compatibility: Android 5.0+ (no iOS support)
  • Companion App: Realme Link
  • Sensors: 3-axis Accelerometer, PPG Heart Rate, Rotor Vibration
  • Sports Mode: 14 different modes
  • Battery: 160mAh (BIS)
  • Battery Endurance: 7 hours (heart rate function enabled), up to 9 hours (heart rate disabled)
  • Charging Time: 2.5 hours (USB magnetic charging)
  • Price in Nepal: Rs. 7,799

Realme Watch Review:

Design & Build

  • Polycarbonate body with silicon strap
  • IP68 dust/water resistance

Realme Watch - Strap

In all honesty, the first thing I noticed about this watch is just how much it’s inspired by the Apple Watch in terms of its looks—but then again, that’s not necessarily a bad thing I guess. Personally, I like how lightweight it is. So much so that it does not even feel like you are wearing anything on your wrists. I’m someone who doesn’t like wearing accessories to bed, so the Realme Watch has really been handy for me to track my sleep. But that in no way covers up for the fact that it feels a little plasticky and cheap.

While we’re on the topic of design, I skipped on using any sort of screen protector here—a decision I now regret a little bit because as you can clearly see, there is quite a bit of scratch in my unit of the Realme Watch. I do admit the careless usage is on my part but had the company gone with the latest generation of Gorilla Glass instead of the third generation, I guess my watch would have been in much better condition.

Comfortable strap

Anyways, I have liked the buckle implementation of the strap that it has. Looks clean and seamless—not as much as the new “Solo Loop” on the new Apple Watch, but still. Once you get used to it, it becomes really easy to put it on or to take it off. Why I am mentioning this is because I think in the long-run comfort and ease of use, it plays a huge role and the Realme Watch has not disappointed me in that regard.

Realme Watch - Power Button

I didn’t have to take off the Watch as much as I have in other smartwatches that I’ve used throughout the years while washing hands or even in instances of rainfall as this one is IP68 rated. However, note that you cannot take it to the shower with you. And because this watch cannot track swimming, it’s no use taking it in the pool with you, so there’s that! That’s a little disappointing seeing how relatively cheaper fitness bands like Mi Band 4, Mi Band 5 can track pool swimming.

Display

  • 1.4-inches TFT LCD panel
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 3 protection
  • 320 x 320 pixels, 380 nits of brightness

Speaking of the display, here you get a 1.4-inches TFT LCD screen with 320 by 320 pixels, 380 nits of peak brightness, and 323 PPI pixel density. Even on paper, you can tell that’s nothing out of the ordinary and my extensive usage proved the exact same.

Realme Watch - Display [1]

Disappointingly, despite receiving multiple updates, the touch response is still unsatisfying. Also, for all the time I used the Realme Watch, I always wished for it to be just a little brighter as I truly struggled with visibility in sunny outdoor conditions.

Fitness, Health Tracking

  • 24-hour real-time heart rate
  • Blood oxygen level (SpO2) monitoring
  • 14 sports modes (including yoga, cricket)
  • No women’s health tracking

It does track basic exercises like walking, running and it even helps you meditate. You have a bunch of options for tracking sports too. But, since it doesn’t support automatic workout detection, all the tracking needs to be manually triggered on the Watch. For instance, if you go for a run, you need to first select the “Running” option, unlike other expensive smartwatches that detect workouts automatically.

Realme Watch - Heart Rate Sensor

Talking about expensive smartwatches, I compared it with Samsung’s Galaxy Watch 3 in regards to their heart rate sensors, blood oxygen monitoring, step counter, and basically everything else as well. Here, during my review period, the Realme Watch gave more or less similar results always in both heart rate and Blood Oxygen monitoring. But, I found the step counting to be slightly overcompensated on the Realme Watch though.

You can check all the aforementioned health-related data in the Watch itself but it will only show you a day’s stats at a time. For a precise and comprehensive reading, the watch must be connected to the Realme Link app, which by the way is only available on Google Play Store. Initially, Realme did say that its iOS version is under development, but as of now, the app is still not available on the App Store which is kinda disappointing.

Realme Watch - Wearing

Anyways, besides all the health stats, you can do quite a lot of things with the app like, changing watch faces although I only found a handful of good options that I like. So, I hope Realme gives us more watch face options through an update pretty soon.

Notification, Performance, & UI

  • Non-actionable app notifications
  • Software is inconsistent and buggy

Likewise, you can also get notifications on calls and messages, although you cannot pick calls because of the lack of a microphone, and neither can you reply to messages. I also found the vibration alerts on getting notifications to be strictly average. But, it is adequate enough to actually make you aware of the notification, even if you are riding a bike.

Overall, the app itself is pretty basic and simple and it’s really easy to work around it, while the same goes for the Watch itself as well. There’s a golden-accented button on the right which doubles as a back and power button.

Realme Watch - Watch Faces

Now about the performance, because this watch runs on an unspecified (but most definitely an under-powered) MediaTek chipset, the animations are pretty basic and the UI/UX feels like a bare minimum. Due to this, the Realme Watch does not feel slow or anything like that.

On a different note, since this is Realme’s first-ever smartwatch, I found a lot of software related issues like how the Find My Phone option wouldn’t work 100% of the time and the watch would get disconnected with the phone every now and then. This would have me miss my call and message notifications which is really counter-productive. As a result, I’ve had to reconnect the watch time and again which was quite a hassle.

Battery

  • 160mAh cell (wireless magnetic charging)

Realme Watch - Charger

Getting to the battery life, its 160mAh cell has yielded promising endurance on my use. On average, it lasted me for about an entire week on a single charge even with automatic heart-rate monitoring every 5 minutes turned on. Charging this thing is quite easy as well since all you need to do is attach it with the 2-pin magnetic charger. It takes around 2.5 hours to fully juice up the battery of the Realme Watch.

Conclusion

In conclusion, I think the Realme Watch is basically a fitness band with a smartwatch design. And as I said earlier, because it is a first-generation product from the company, there is still some software related issue that Realme needs to work on.

So, should I recommend it for the price it asks? Well, even though it nails the basics of a smartwatch, I think it’s a bit overpriced. Yes, it’s technically just a $50 smartwatch, so you might be wondering why I am complaining. But the thing is, if you browse AliExpress or Gearbest, you will find so many other smartwatches similar to the Realme Watch in terms of functionality and quality, and yet, they cost half the price of what Realme is charging. Also, if you can manage to squeeze in a little more budget, the Mobvoi TicWatch GTX that retail at around Rs. 9,999 is a slightly better option.

  • Watch our video review of the Realme Watch.

Realme Watch Review: Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • IP68 dust/water resistance
  • Great battery life
  • Comfortable strap

Cons:

  • Build quality isn’t great
  • Poor colors, visibility of the display
  • Touch response is inconsistent
  • No automatic workout detection
  • Data-sync between the app & phone is buggy

Netgear Products Price in Nepal: Switch, Extender, Router, AP & ReadyNAS [Updated]

GadgetByte
-
0
Netgear Products Price in Nepal: Switch, Extender, Router, AP & ReadyNAS [Updated]

If you are thinking of buying any new networking gear, you would be thrilled to find out that there is a new player in the town. Netgear, a company that specializes in networking hardware, is now officially available in Nepal. In this post, we will be taking a look at all the Netgear products that are available in Nepal along with their specs, price, and authorized distributor.

Netgear: A Brand Overview

Netgear is a company based in San Jose, California. The company was founded back in 1996 and is mainly known for its networking solutions. However, the company has its presence in smart home security, network storage, and mobile broadband as well. Netgear designs products for home, business, and even service providers.

The majority of the company’s products are based on technologies like WiFi, LTE, Ethernet, and powerline. Netgear’s portfolio of products includes both wireless and wired devices that enable networking, broadband access, and network connectivity.

Netgear Products Official Price in Nepal (Summary)

SN Products MRP SP Warranty

Switches
1. GSG608 Rs. 7,750 Rs. 4,200 3 Years
2. GS108PP Rs. 28,050 Rs. 15,100 Lifetime
3. GS116PP Rs. 43,200 Rs. 28,200 Lifetime
4. GS316 Rs. 13,400 Rs. 9,800 3 Years
5. GS324 Rs. 19,200 Rs. 16,700 3 Years
6. GS108PE Rs. 22,400 Rs. 9,800 Lifetime
7. GS308T Rs. 10,150 Rs. 9,200 Lifetime

Router and Access Points
1. Orbi AC1200 WiFi System Rs. 35,200 Rs. 24,900 1 year
2. Orbi AC3000 WiFi System Rs. 60,800 Rs. 49,400 1 year
3. Nighthawk Mesh WiFi 6 System Rs. 65,000 Rs. 51,000 1 year
4. AC1750 Dual-Band WiFi Router Rs. 15,850 Rs. 9,900 1 year
5. Nighthawk AC2300 MU-MIMO Wave 2 Router Rs. 27,200 Rs. 19,800 1 year
6. AC1200 Dual Band WiFi USB 3.0 Adapter Rs. 4,850 Rs. 4,400 2 years

Netgear ReadyNAS
1. ReadyNAS RN212 Rs. 64,000 Rs. 40,500 3 years
2. ReadyNAS RN214 Rs. 80,000 Rs. 54,500 3 Years

Netgear Switches and Extenders Price in Nepal

GSG608 Gigabit Ethernet Switch (8-bit)

GS600 series Gigabit Ethernet Switches support full-duplex standard and they can reach up to 2000 Mbps on each of the ports. Each port determines the appropriate speed and full/half-duplex mode.

GSG608 Specs:

  • Dimensions: 177W x 117D x 31H-mm; 0.31kg
  • Network Ports: 8 auto-speed sensing UTP ports
  • Bandwidth: 16 Gbps (non-blocking)
  • Forward Rate:
    10 Mbps Port: 14,800 packets/sec
    100 Mbps Port: 1,48,000 packets/sec
    1000 Mbps Port: 1,488,000 packets/sec
  • Network Latency:
    100 to 100 Mbps: 20 µ (Max)
    1000 to 1000 Mbps: 10 µ (Max)
  • Packet Buffer Memory: 1 Mb
  • MAC address database: 4,000
  • Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF): 87,600 hours (~ 10 years)
  • MRP: Rs. 7,750

GS108PP / GS116PP PoE+ Switches

Netgear GS108PP Switch

GS108PP and GS116PP switches come with 8 and 16 Gigabit copper ports respectively. Each port can provide up to 30W to any device. They come with rack-mount and wall-mount kits to make use of their small form factor. The fanless design makes sure the operation does not produce any noise.

GS108PP Specs:

  • Dimensions: 236W x 102D x 27H-mm; 0.6kg
  • Network Ports: 8 PoE+ (123W PoE Budget)
  • Bandwidth: 16 Gbps
  • Buffer Size: 192KB
  • Max MAC entries: 4K
  • Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF): 2,752,476 hours
  • Hardware Replacement Warranty: TRULY LIFETIME
  • MRP: Rs. 28,050

GS116PP Specs:

  • Dimensions: 286W x 102D x 27H-mm; 0.88kg
  • Network Ports: 16 (183W PoE Budget)
  • Bandwidth: 32 Gbps
  • Buffer Size: 1MB
  • Max Mac entries: 4K
  • Mean Time Between Failure (MTBF): 2,088,514 hours
  • Hardware Replacement Warranty: TRULY LIFETIME
  • MRP: Rs. 43,200

GS316 / GS324 Gigabit Ethernet Unmanaged Switches

Netgear 300 Series consists of plug-and-play switches for home and small office. These switches sport a rugged design for durability. GS316 and GS324 are wall-mountable and they have a fanless design for silent operation.

GS316 Specs:

  • Dimensions: 286W x 101D x 26H-mm; 0.84kg
  • Network Ports: 16 (10/100/1000Mbps)
  • Bandwidth: 32 Gbps
  • Forwarding Rate: 1,488,000 packets/sec (using 64-byte packets)
  • Network Latency (Max): 3.9 µsec (using 64-byte packets)
  • Buffer Size: 768 KB
  • MAC Address Table Size: 2K
  • Hardware Replacement Warranty: 3 Years
  • MRP: Rs. 13,400

GS324 Specs:

  • Dimensions: 252W x 180D x 44H-mm; 1.31kg
  • Network Ports: 24 (10/100/1000Mbps)
  • Bandwidth: 48 Gbps
  • Forward Rate: 1,488,000 packets/sec (using 64-byte packets)
  • Network Latency (Max): 4.7 µsec (using 64-byte packets)
  • Buffer Size: 512 KB
  • MAC Address Table Size: 8K
  • Hardware Replacement Warranty: 3 Years
  • MRP: Rs. 16,700

GS108PE Smart Managed Plus Switches

GS108PE supports fundamental network features including VLAN, QoS, and IGMP Snooping for better optimization. The setup is easy as it has plug-and-play connectivity.

GS108PE Specs:

  • Dimensions: 158W x 101D x 29H-mm; 0.54kg
  • Network Ports: 8 Gigabit ports (4 55W PoE Budget)
  • Bandwidth: 16 Gbps
  • Buffer Size: 192 KB
  • Max MAC entries: 4K
  • Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF): 1,242,394 hours
  • Hardware Replacement Warranty: TRULY LIFETIME
  • MRP: Rs. 22,400

GS308T Gigabit Ethernet Switch

Netgear Smart Managed Pro S350 series switches including the GS308T are designed for converged networks where a single platform carries voice, video, and other data. GS308T comes with advanced features such as Access Control Lists (ACLs), Quality of Service (QoS), Link Aggregation Control Protocol (LACP), Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) for high-speed and secured networks.

GS308T Specs:

  • Dimensions: 158W x 101D x 30H-mm; 0.41kg
  • Network Ports: 8 10M/100M/1G RJ-45 Copper ports
  • CPU: 500MHz
  • Memory: 32MB Flash and 128MB RAM
  • Bandwidth: 16 Gbps
  • Packet Forward Rate: 11.9Mpps (using 64-byte packets)
  • 1G Copper Latency:
    64-byte: 3.995 µs
    1518-byte: 4.202 µs
    9216-byte: 3.966 µs
  • Packet Buffer Memory: 512KB
  • MAC address Database Size (48-bit): 8K
  • Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF): 2,957,592 hours (~337 years)
  • Hardware Replacement Warranty: TRULY LIFETIME
  • MRP: Rs. 10,150

Netgear AC1200 WiFi Range Extender

Netgear claims that the AC1200 is the world’s smallest wall-plug extender. It supports dual-band WiFi up to 1200Mbps.

AC1200 Specs:

  • Dimensions: 55.17 x 67.17 x 39mm; 130g
  • Standards:
    IEEE 802.11 b/g/n 2.4 GHz
    IEEE 802.11 a/n/ac 5GHz
    1 x 10/100Mbps Ethernet port with auto-sensing technology
  • Security: WPA/WPA2-PSK
  • MRP: Rs. 4,850

Netgear ReadyNAS Price in Nepal

ReadyNAS 210 Series (RN212/RN214)

Netgear ReadyNAS RN214

Netgear ReadyNAS 210 series consists of two high-performance Network Attached Storage with transcoding capability of FHD 1080p. Similarly, RN212 and RN214 offer five layers of protection for users’ data. The ReadyCLOUD portal-based user interface and app are available on PC, Mac, smartphones, and tablets.

RN212 Specs:

  • Dimensions: 220 x 101 x 142; 2.03kg
  • CPU: Quad-core 1.4GHz ARM Cortex A15
  • Memory: 2GB
  • Drive Bays: 2
  • Drive Types: SATA/SSD 2.5″ or 3.5″
  • Ports: 1x eSATA, 2x Gigabit LAN Ports, 3x USB 3.0 ports
  • Max Capacity: 12TB
  • MRP: Rs. 64,000

RN214 Specs:

  • Dimension: 223 x 134 x 205; 4.02kg
  • CPU: Quad-core 1.4GHz ARM Cortex A15
  • Memory: 2GB
  • Drive Bays: 4
  • Drive Types: SATA/SSD 2.5″ or 3.5″
  • Ports: 1x eSATA, 2x Gigabit LAN Ports, 3x USB 3.0 ports
  • Max Capacity: 24TB
  • MRP: Rs. 80,000

Netgear Routers and Access Points Price in Nepal

Orbi Whole Home AC1200 WiFi System Router (Router + 2 Extenders)

The Orbi Mesh WiFi system consists of an Orbi WiFi Router and two satellite extenders that offer a combined speed of up to 1.2Gbps over an area of up to 4,500 sq ft. Users can manage the kid’s screen time using Circle Smart Parental Controls. Netgear Armor protects the network against potential internet threats.

Orbi AC1200 Specs:

  • Dimension:
    Router: 4.1 x 4.1 x 2.7-inches; 0.58lb
    Extenders: 4.1 x 4.1x 2.7-inches;0.54lb
  • Simultaneous Dual-band WiFi:
    Radio 1: IEEE 802.11b/g/n 2.4GHz- 256 – QAM support
    Radio 2: IEEE 802.11a/n/ac 5GHz- 256 – QAM support
  • Tx/Rx: 2×2 (2.4GHz) + 2×2 (5GHz)
  • Processor: Quad-core 710MHz
  • Memory (Router): 256MB Flash and 512MB RAM
  • Antenna: 2 internal antennas each
  • Ports: 2x 10/100/1000Mbps Gigabit Ethernet ports  (1 WAN and 1 LAN)
  • Security: Netgear Armor
  • Voice Control: Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant
  • MRP: Rs. 35,200

Orbi Whole Home AC3000 Tri-band WiFi System

Orbi Whole Home AC3000 WiFi system consists of an Orbi WiFi Router and Satellite that offer coverage of up to 5,000 sq ft. With dedicated WiFi backhaul, Netgear claims better 4K HD streaming and gaming even with more devices. Users can also make use of the Circle and Orbi app to easily manage their WiFI.

Orbi AC3000 Specs:

  • Dimension: 6.7 x 4.1 x 2.7-inches; 1.96lb
  • Simultaneous Tri-band WiFi:
    Radio1: IEEE 802.11b/g/n 2.4GHz- 256QAM support
    Radio2: IEEE 802.11a/n/ac 5GHz- 256QAM support
    Radio3: IEEE 802.11a/n/ac 5GHz- 256QAM support
  • Memory (Router): 4GB Flash and 512MB RAM
  • Antenna (Router and Satellite): 6 internal antennas with amplifiers each
  • Ports: 
    Orbi Router: 4xGigabit Ethernet ports (1 WAN & 3x LAN), 1x USB 2.0
    Satellite: 4xGigabit Ethernet LAN ports, 1x USB 2.0
  • Security: WPA/WPA2-PSK Support
  • Voice Control: Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant
  • MRP: Rs. 60,800

Netgear Nighthawk Mesh Wifi 6 System ( Router + 2 Satellite extenders)

Nighthawk Mesh WiFi 6 system can offer a combined speed of up to 1.8Gbps over an area of up to 4,500 sq ft. Users can even expand the coverage further. The WiFi 6 boasts up to four times the performance of AC WiFI. It is protected by Nighthawk Armor and users can manage the network via the Nighthawk app.

Nighthawk Mesh Wifi 6 System Specs:

  • Dimension (Router and Satellite): 4.8 x 4.8 x 2.5-inches each; 0.63lb each
  • Simultaneous Dual-band WiFi:
    Radio 1: IEEE 802.11b/g/n/ax 2.4GHz- 1024 – QAM support
    Radio 2: IEEE 802.11a/n/ac/ax 5GHz- 1024 – QAM support
  • Tx/Rx: 2×2 (2.4GHz) + 2×2 (5GHz)
  • Memory (Router and Satellite): 128MB Flash and 256MB RAM
  • Antenna: 4 internal antennas each
  • Ports: 
    Router: 2x WAN 10/100/1000Mbps Gigabit Ethernet port (1 WAN & 1 LAN)
    Satellite: 1x 10/100/1000Mbps Gigabit Ethernet port each
  • MRP: Rs. 65,000

Netgear AC1750 Smart Dual Band Gigabit WiFi Router

Netgear Nighthawk AC2300 MU-MIMO Wave 2 Router

It is a smart WiFi router with can coverage of up to 1750 sq ft. At a time, it can provide a connection to up to 25 devices. The router can be set up, configured, and updated using the Nighthawk app.

Netgear AC1750 Specs:

  • Dimension: 9.27 x 5.94 x 2.14-inches; 377g
  • Simultaneous Dual-band WiFi:
    Radio 1: IEEE 802.11b/g/n 2.4GHz
    Radio 2: IEEE 802.11a/n/ac 5GHz
  • Tx/Rx: 2×2 (2.4GHz) + 4×4 (5GHz)
  • Processor: Quad-core 710MHz
  • Memory: 128MB NAND Flash and 128MB DDR3 RAM
  • Ports: 5x 10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet Ports (1WAN + 4LAN) with auto-sensing technology, 1x USB 2.0
  • MRP: Rs. 15,850

Netgear Nighthawk AC2300 MU-MIMO Wave 2 Router

This router is designed with gaming and streaming mobile devices in mind. It supports MU-MIMO for simultaneous streaming. It comes with Netgear Armor protection. Users can speed up to 2.3Gbps (1625 + 600 Mbps).

Netgear AC2300 Specs:

  • Dimension: 11.22 x 7.26 x 1.97-inches; 1.65lbs
  • Simultaneous Dual-band WiFi:
    Radio 1: IEEE 802.11b/g/n 2.4GHz
    Radio 2: IEEE 802.11a/n/ac 5GHz- 1024 QAM support
  • Processor: Dual-core 1GHz
  • Memory (Router): 128MB Flash and 256MB RAM
  • Ports: 5x 10/100/1000 Gigabit Ethernet Ports (1WAN + 4LAN), 1x USB 3.0, 1x USB 2.0
  • Antennas: 3 (detachable)
  • MRP: Rs. 27,200

Netgear AC1200 Dual Band WiFi USB 3.0 Adapter

It comes with a USB 3.0 port to connect your computer or laptop to an 11ac network. It offers a speed of up to 300/867Mbps. The high-gain antenna is adjustable.

AC1200 Dual Band WiFi USB 3.0 Adapter Specs:

  • Dimension:
    Adapter: 3.66 x 1.24 x 0.57-inches; 28g
    Dock: 2.49 x 1.76x 1.39-inches; 90g
  • Simultaneous Dual-band WiFi:
    Radio 1: IEEE 802.11b/g/n 2.4GHz
    Radio 2: IEEE 802.11a/n/ac 5GHz
  • MRP: Rs. 4,850

Netgear Authorized Distributor in Nepal

The authorized distributor of Netgear products in Nepal is Infocom Solutions Private Limited. It is a subsidiary of the ICTC Group of Companies. As of now, the company has made available switches, routers, Access Points, and Network Attached Storage (NAS) in the Nepali market.

Infocom Solutions Private Limited

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Review: Best Gaming Laptop Of The Year?

GadgetByte
-
0
MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Review: Best Gaming Laptop Of The Year?

MSI regularly churns out great laptops. Even their “mid-range or budget” gaming laptops are far ahead of their competitors. Thus, I find it quite pleasing to use and review an MSI laptop. Last time out, we had reviewed the GP65 Leopard. And this time around, we bring to you the review of MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS with us.

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Specifications:

  • Processor: Intel Core i9-10980HK
  • Display: 15.6″ LED-Backlit FHD (1920×1080) 240Hz IPS-level Panel
  • GPU: Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super, with 8GB GDDR6 VRAM
  • RAM: 16GB DDR4 2666MHz
  • Storage: 1TB SSD
  • Ports: 2 x USB 3.2 Type-C, 3 x USB 3.2 Type-A, 1 x HDMI 2.0, 1 x mini DisplayPort, 1 x 3.5mm headphone jack, 1x RJ45, 1x SD Card Reader
  • Connectivity: Integrated 802.11 ax Wi-Fi 6 + Bluetooth 5.1, Killer GB LAN
  • Keyboard: SteelSeries Keyboard; Per-Key RGB Lighting
  • Battery: 99.9 WH Lithium-Polymer Battery
  • Price in Nepal: Rs 370,000

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Review:

This laptop is a follow-up to the GE65, which was a beast of a laptop. Performance-wise it was superb. However, its subpar battery life and sound system left many people disappointed. Nonetheless, the GE66 has a lot to live up to. 

And with my experience with this laptop, I won’t shy away from saying that this laptop does stake a claim to be one of the best gaming laptops of the year. However, there is no such thing as a perfect laptop and the same goes for this one too. So, let’s dive into our review of the MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS to find out its good’s and the bad’s. 

Configuration Options

People who are planning on buying the GE66 are really spoilt for choices. Basically, there are 3 different versions of this laptop. There’s the 10SF with RTX 2070, 10SFS with RTX 2070 Super, and finally the top-end 10GS with RTX 2080 Super Max-Q. And depending on the model you get, the screen options are FHD; 144Hz, 240Hz, 300Hz, or UHD with 60Hz refresh rate.

Out here in Nepal, the one available in the market is 10SFS. Our review unit is equipped with an Intel Core i9-10980HK processor, an FHD 240Hz panel, Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 Super, 16GB DDR4 2666Mhz RAM, and 1TB SSD. And it is priced at Rs. 370,000. By the way, there are 2 DIMM slots and you can increase the RAM to up to 64GB.

Another option that is available in Nepal only differs in the processor and the storage available. The other one has a 10th Gen Intel Core i7 processor and 2TB SSD. And it too is priced at Rs. 370,000. Finally, the cheapest option with regards to the GE66 comes with 10th Gen Intel Core i7, RTX 2070 1TB SSD, and a 240Hz panel. No 300Hz option in Nepal. Anyway, depending upon your preference you can go for either of the three. 

Design & Build

With that out of the way, let’s get into the design of the GE66. It has a complete design overhaul from its predecessor the GE65. Let’s put it this way, it is subtle, yet it gives you a gaming vibe.

MSI GE66 Raider Design 10SFS

At the first glance, the GE66 Raider looks similar to the GT76 Titan. The red stripes from the GE65 are completely gone. It now looks a bit subdued. It has a gray aluminum lid with only the dragon sigil near the top. Furthermore, the logo’s color is also toned down and it perfectly blends in with the granite gray lid. However, the subtlety is somewhat reduced by the angle near the hinges. But hey, I’m not complaining cause it does add some modern looks to the design. 

Thankfully, MSI has removed the Raider moniker from the rear edge. It now sports various I/O ports and that’s a more sensible choice. The ports on the rear edge include a power port, HDMI, ethernet port, USB-Type C port, and a mini DisplayPort. And on either side of the ports are a couple of air vents. 

The lid was subtle but the front edge is anything but subtle. The front lip is occupied by a huge glass prism/lightbar that MSI calls Aurora. It offers 16.7 million colors, customizable through the SteelSeries Engine app and it syncs with the per-key lighting of the keyboard. You can turn the lights on when you want to flex your laptop around other gamers or choose to completely turn it off in an office environment.

The lighting is great and all but the lightbar just runs a tiny bit off the length of the front edge. I found it a bit problematic as I felt the sting of the overrun edges, quite a few times. The interior is made up of onyx-colored aluminum. It feels smooth and does not attract any smudges. There’s enough room to rest your palms and the keyboard lies a tad bit below the level of the touchpad. 

Thick bezels

Its beautiful display is surrounded by thin bezels on either side, however, the top and the bottom are still quite thick. 

 

In addition to the ports on the rear edge, there are three additional USB Type-A ports, an SDXC card reader, a headphone jack, and a USB Type-C port. There’s a glaring omission of Thunderbolt 3, however, to appease gamers, the unit does have Killer wired and wireless chipsets for Gigabit Ethernet connection. Hey, you win some you lose some, right? By the way, there’s also a status LED that shows whether the laptop is charging or not on the left-hand side.

charging brick GE66 MSI

The laptop measures 14.1 x 10.5 x 0.9 inches and weighs around 2.3 kilos. And it’s pretty much standard these days. However, you can get smaller 15-inch laptops these days such as the GS66 Stealth. But the extra thickness in the GE66 does come in handy as it allows the laptop to pack a larger cooling grill. You’ll find one on both sides and in addition to that, there are six heat sinks and two fans to cool the device. We will talk more about the cooling capabilities a bit later.

On the whole, the design is sort of a perfect blend between a gaming laptop and a work laptop. Furthermore, there’s little to no flex on either the lid or the keyboard, and the build material suggests that the laptop is a very robust one.

Display

The panel on this one is the same as that of the GE66. It too has a panel with a 240Hz refresh rate. The IPS level panel has great viewing angles and reproduces great color both indoors as well as outdoors. The FHD display gives little to complain about because you can observe great details on anything that you are viewing. With such fine details on the screen, you’ll find playing games such as The Witcher 3 a lot more eye-pleasing.

GE66 Raider display

The display is fairly color accurate. It covers about 100% sRGB color gamut and 72% AdobeRGB. And these days it is the standard. Furthermore, due to the MSI True Color software, you’ll find that its grayscale and colors lie in the ideal range. Overall, I’d label it as a good display for content creation. However, you can always get a more color-accurate display such as the Predator or Razer Blade.

As I had mentioned earlier, my test unit has a 240Hz panel and for most gamers out there, this should suffice. A 300Hz variant is also available in the market(not in Nepal though), however, unless you are into ultra-competitive esports and play low impact games, there’s simply no need for you to buy that one. 

For others, the 240Hz is more than enough. You get to enjoy the vibrant colors and at the same time get great fps on your games unless you are playing a AAA title on max settings that are.

Keyboard and Touchpad

GE66 keyboard

The SteelSeries keyboard is tailored for gamers, however, it did bring out mixed feelings in me. It’s clicky, has deep travels, and overall provides a great typing experience. However, there are some key combinations such as Insert+delete and the cramped up function and control key that you’ll have to get used to.

There’s no Numpad and the windows key makes a comeback in the GE66. The GE65 did not have one to prevent gamers from accidentally pressing them while in an intense gaming session. Well, it is here now, however, if you don’t need it, you can disable it from the Dragon Center app.

keyboard lighting GE66 MSI Aurora

There are some useful shortcuts on the keyboard. You can adjust keyboard lighting through the F10 and F11 buttons, change the color scheme from F9, activate cooler boost from F10, and open up the Dragon Center from F7. For customization of the key colors, you’ll have to go to the SteelSeries Engine app. 

As for the touchpad, I’ve no complaints whatsoever. It has a smooth finish and thus it ensures quick inputs. It is sturdy enough and the lack of buttons means that clicks are triggered by pressing the bottom surface.

Dragon Center

The last time I used the MSI Dragon Center was on the GP65 Leopard. And frankly, I was agitated I had to use the app. It kept crashing, had to re-install it a few times just to get it working. It was a mess. 

And it’s no different on the MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS one either—as I came to discover during the review. Thankfully, I did not have to re-install the app multiple times, nonetheless, the app remains as buggy as ever. I had to restart the entire system just to change some minor settings.

You will be using the Dragon Center a lot. All the customizations, barring keyboards, and lightbar color have to be done through this app. The buggy nature of this app will certainly get on your nerves. MSI should really do something about the Dragon Center pronto. 

Speaker, Camera, and Battery Life

There are 2x 2W speakers on either edge, and the sound they produce is fairly average. Given the laptop’s price, I expected something more but was quite disappointed. You can surely get other laptops with a better audio system at a lower price. Furthermore, the fans on a full blast will completely drown the audio. Thus, there’s still a lot of room for improvement is all I can say.

The addition of a 1080p webcam is a welcome change from the standard 720p that we regularly find. Taken in isolation, you’ll not find it an amazing addition to the laptop, but when compared to the ones on other laptops, it certainly offers a tad bit more. 

Most laptops in this category are plagued by bad battery life. But, the 99.9Wh unit on this one blows away the competitors. While web surfing continuously at about 75% brightness, I was able to squeeze around 4 hours 35 minutes. By decreasing the brightness you can certainly get maybe an hour or so more. And that’s really great.

Hardware and Performance

Our review unit of the MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS is equipped with 16gigs of RAM. However, there are two SO-DIMM slots and thus you can increase your RAM to up to 64GB. Similarly, there are two M.2 slots inside, out of which one only one is free. The 1TB SSD is great, but you’ll see that it quickly starts to fill up once you install a handful of AAA titles. So, with a free M.2 slot, you can always install another SSD yourself. 

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS

Nonetheless, the 1TB SSD itself gives you nothing to complain for. Its CrystalDiskMark scores indicate that reading or writing is not a problem for this device.

The combination of the 10th Gen Intel Core i9-10980HK and the RTX 2070 Super spells for a power performer. As you’d expect, the GE66 Raider can deal with basic productivity tasks without any trouble. Even with over 15 tabs open on Google Chrome and few word files open, at no point did I notice any lag in performance. 

Gaming performance is impressive too. It can run all AAA titles without breaking a sweat at FHD resolution. The RTX 2070 super with 2560 CUDA cores offers better performance than your standard RTX 2070. I did not notice any performance lag over the 1-hour gaming session with battlefield V. I was able to get around 160fps in medium settings, 140 in high, and about 117fps in ultra settings. The laptop did not give way with DXR on either. With DRX on, the stats are like this: 80fps Ultra, 89-90 high, and about 104 in medium settings. Thus, no matter the setting you choose, you are bound to get pretty good fps and also enjoy the magnificent display. 

FPS stat in various games

High/Ultra Medium Low
Wither 3: Wild Hunt 102 120 155
Battlefield 5 (DXR off) 117 140 160
Battlefield 5 (DXR on) 80 90 104
Apex Legends 143 144 144
Sekiro: Shadows Die Twice

60 (in all settings)
Warframe

120 (in all settings)

Mind you, I played these games in the extreme performance mode with the cooler booster on, so the fps count may differ depending upon the mode you play in.

Thermals

The MSI GE66 Raider packs in some high-end stuff, and they require a high-end cooling system. As mentioned, previously, it has six heat pipes that are wider than that of its predecessor and its two fans come with 53 blades per fan. Furthermore, it is equipped with Cooler Booster 5. 

The cooling system does somewhat of a very good job in my opinion. Touchpad and the palm rest area are void of any heating issues. And I only noticed the heating in the central area of the keyboard after about 1 and a half hours of gaming. Although I have to mention that I was playing games with Cooler Booster on, so that might have come to the aid of the laptop. However, the cooler booster mode does have one drawback. It runs loud. And in this case, loud is an understatement. 

The plastic undercarriage remains relatively cool in normal use. Though you will start to feel the heat after using it for a couple of hours. But that’s somewhat expected anyway. 

MSI GE66 Raider 10SFS Review: Verdict

All things considered, the MSI GE66 Raider is the perfect follow up to the GE65. The LED lightbar and the 99.9 WHr battery are clearly the selling points for this device. However, the laptop is not just limited to style and battery life, overall the RTX 2070 Super and i9-10980HK deliver solid performance and give users no room for complaints. 

However, the heavy fan noise, poor speaker, and the ever buggy Dragon Center leave you asking for a tad bit more. Nonetheless, I’d still rate the MSI GE66 Raider as one of the best performing laptops of 2020.

Nokia 2.4 Review: Same Old, Same Old

Nikhil Shrestha
-
0
Nokia 2.4 Review: Same Old, Same Old

Nokia phones, especially the budget and mid-range ones, share this cohesiveness in terms of their design, relative performance, and overall user experience. Maybe that’s for the better, or worse: it’s not up to me to say. Anyway, the new Nokia 2.4 doesn’t really evoke a sense of innovation as the Finnish company didn’t bother to bring any changes from its predecessor—I’m talking about the design, of course. So, how does this “iterative upgrade” of a phone perform? Allow me to discuss more in this review of the Nokia 2.4.

Nokia 2.4 Specifications:

  • Body: 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34-inches, 189gm
  • Display: 6.5-inches IPS LCD panel, 80.6% screen-to-body ratio, 270 PPI
  • Resolution: HD+ (1600 x 720 pixels), 20:9 aspect ratio
  • Chipset: MediaTek Helio P22 (12nm mobile platform)
  • CPU: Octa-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53
  • GPU: PowerVR GE8320
  • RAM: 2/3GB RAM
  • Storage: 32/64GB eMMC 5.1 internal storage (expandable)
  • Software & UI: Android 10 (Android One)
  • Rear Camera: Dual-camera;
    – 13MP primary sensor
    – 2MP depth sensor
    – LED flash
  • Front Camera: 5MP sensor (teardrop notch)
  • Security: Physical Fingerprint Scanner (rear-mounted)
  • Audio: 3.5mm headphone jack, Bottom-firing speaker, 2 microphones
  • Connectivity: Dual-SIM (Nano), WiFi 802.11 b/g/n, Bluetooth 5.0, GPS / A-GPS / Glonass / Beidou, Micro USB, 4G LTE
  • Sensors: Accelerometer (G-sensor), Ambient Light, Proximity
  • Battery: 4500mAh with 5W charging (5V/1A)
  • Colors: Dusk, Charcoal, Fjord
  • Price in Nepal: Rs. 14,599 (2/32GB)
  • Buy Here

Nokia 2.4 Review:

Design & Build

  • Polycarbonate build material
  • 3D nano-texture at the back

Nokia 2.4 - Design

Like I said earlier, there’s hardly any deviation in the design language of the Nokia 2.4 compared to the Nokia 2.3—let alone an overhaul. It is still sturdy and feels super nice on the hand. For what it’s worth, the phone much more premium for the price. As expected, it has a polycarbonate body with a 3D nano-textured cover at the back. This offers a nice grip and even though it’s not a compact phone, I had no trouble holding it in.

Similarly, the rear panel is immune to fingerprints and smudges too, although it can get a little clammy after a while. The tiny space between the ridges may also attract dust particles which will be a little hard to get off. So, using a case is advised regardless. Nokia 2.4’s color options are quite attractive as well even though it doesn’t have a fancy reflective back.

Available in Fjord, Dusk, and Charcoal variants, the latter that I have with me complements the overall aesthetics nicely. Moving on, there’s a 3.5mm headphone jack at the top frame alongside a primary microphone. The volume and power buttons are placed on the right, while there’s the trademark dedicated Google Assistant button on the left.

Finally, you’ll find the secondary mic, a micro USB port, and the speaker grille at the bottom. Like always, the Google Assistant (GA) button cannot be remapped natively, though you can with a third-party app like Button Mapper. You can already trigger GA using your voice or swiping from the bottom edge of the screen, so having a dedicated button feels redundant at this point. 

Display

  • 6.5-inches HD+ IPS LCD panel
  • Slightly heavy on the bezels
  • No protective glass of any kind

Getting to the display, Nokia 2.4 now has a bigger 6.5-inch IPS LCD panel, but with the same old HD+ resolution and a 20:9 aspect ratio. For its sub-15K price point, the inferior HD resolution isn’t surprising. But I must say, looking at the display contents with a fair enough distance, it actually doesn’t look that bad. Yet, having it close to you (like you would normally), one can notice the lack of sharpness in images.

Nokia 2.4 - Display [1]

Moreover, in its default setting, the display is a fair-bit on the warm side too. But it’s not something to worry about as you can easily dial it down to your preference under the “White Balance” option in the settings. Nokia 2.4 can get bright enough for indoors and cloudy outdoor situations but you will struggle to view the phone’s content under direct sunlight. Like any other traditional budget phone, you’re greeted with quite a bit of bezel here as well.

Thankfully, the rounded edges of the Nokia 2.4’s display don’t have any sort of discoloration. There’s a teardrop notch up top for the selfie camera and a big chin that’s home to a “Nokia” branding. Overall, the phone manages to net out 80.6% screen-to-body ratio. Unlike its predecessor, I didn’t notice a single instance of accidental touches on the Nokia 2.4.

Performance

  • Octa-core MediaTek Helio P22 SoC (12nm)
  • 2/3GB RAM, with 32/64GB of expandable internal storage
  • Android 10 (and a part of the Android One program)

The performance sees a much-required boost as it comes with an octa-core Helio P22 processor from MediaTek—while the Nokia 2.3 was powered by a quad-core Helio A22. Because of this, the user experience is considerably better. The image processing is faster and so are other assorted actions. But mind you, this assertion only comes with a direct comparison between the aforementioned phones when in reality, the core performance of the Nokia 2.4 still isn’t that great.

Here, Nokia has coupled the Helio P22 with either 2/3GB of RAM and up to 64GB of expandable internal storage. My review unit has a 2/32GB configuration and it didn’t fare well under my usage. First off, the RAM management is almost laughable. Out of the 2GB available, the system occupies around 60% and you only get about 700MB to play around with.

Nokia 2.4 - Storage Usage

Because of this, I time-and-again witnessed stutters and lags during gaming or even light multitasking sessions. The system UI would also briefly misbehave when certain heavy apps are in the memory. Furthermore, out of 32GB, 11GB is occupied by the system itself. So, I would highly encourage you to get the 3/64GB model instead.

Gaming

Talking about gaming, light games like Among Us, Clash Royale, Mario Kart Tour, etc. work perfectly fine. Similarly, I tried playing Call of Duty: Mobile and it ran fine under “Low” graphics and “Low” frame rate although upping the frame rate to medium or high would result in frequent lags.

On the other hand, PUBG Mobile Lite is playable even in “HD” graphics and ‘Extreme” frame rates. But, your gameplay will be subject to frequent stutters. Moreover, the touch response on the display would give up on me at times, making my gameplay experience abysmal.

Nokia 2.4 - Gaming

Nokia 2.4 runs on stock Android 10 and is also a part of the Android One program, thus promising two years of software and up to three years of security updates. At the time of writing this review, my unit of Nokia 2.4 has already received September’s security patch. HMD Global had already revealed the Android 11 update plan for the phone on Q1 2021 but quickly took down the post. So, when it’ll receive the latest Android update remains a mystery now.

Camera

  • Dual-cameras at the back
  • (13MP primary lens with 2MP depth sensor)
  • 5MP front-facing camera inside a teardrop notch

There’s the same dual rear camera setup at the back and a single front-facing lens on the Nokia 2.4. As a result, the camera performance is more or less the same as its predecessor. The 13MP primary sensor alongside a 2MP depth sensor and the LED flash has been placed inside a vertical pill-shaped module, with a dismissable bump.

Normal Images

Images from the primary sensor can look pretty good if you can get ample lighting.

They are fairly sharp and have plenty of details to enjoy and the colors aren’t all that bad either. Photos do tend to look a-bit undersaturated (sometimes a bit hazy as well), and the camera can’t lock-in focus fast enough either.

Turning on HDR does help a bit in terms of colors—but it’s a hit-or-miss. Most of the time, the difference between HDR & non-HDR images is practically zero but sometimes, it works wonders.

Portrait Images

Likewise, the 2MP depth sensor is just about average.

The edge detection is flawed and at times, the subject can look a bit oversaturated.

Nighttime Images

Nighttime images aren’t any good either. It looks completely hazy and the image is rather soft and full of grains.

Surprisingly, there’s a dedicated “Night Mode” in the camera UI but as I suspected, it’s a complete gimmick and doesn’t improve the image quality in any way.

Selfie Images

Selfies from the 5MP selfie camera, just like the primary lens can look okay-ish with plenty of ambient light. But for the most part, subjects look pale and lifeless.

Software-based selfie portrait is not that good either and the edge-detection is rather flawed here too. 

Videos

In terms of videos, Nokia 2.4 maxes out at 1080p from both front and back cameras. The sensor fails to lock-in exposure and the footage comes out very wobbly. Once again, I was surprised to find out the “Video Stabilization” feature inside the camera settings but this was a gimmick as well.

Battery

  • 4500mAh battery with 5W charging

Getting to the battery, the phone has a decent 4500mAh cell which Nokia claims can last up to 2 days. The company’s similar claim in its other devices with similar battery capacity was true during our review and thankfully, Nokia 2.4 proudly embraces that tradition.

Nokia 2.4 - Charging

With light to medium usage, it can easily last you two days and should also get you through your day on heavy use. I watched a 2.5 hours movie with full brightness and max volume, and it only depleted 22% of the battery. All in all, you can get somewhere between 7 – 8 hours of screen-on time on this phone. But charging it via the micro USB connection takes a while. With its 5W charging, it took me about 3 hours 5 minutes to fully juice up the phone from 0 – 100%.

Others

  • A circular physical fingerprint scanner
  • 3.5mm headphone jack, single bottom-firing speaker

Other features of the phone include a circular plastic fingerprint sensor at the back. It’s definitely not the fastest one out there and takes almost a second to unlock. Also, if you try using it back-to-back, most of the time, it won’t work on the first try. And as usual, sweaty, wet fingers are a no-go too. Nokia 2.4 also supports face unlock but it’s even slower and less secure. Taking about 2 seconds per unlock, the lock screen doesn’t even show any indicator if it’s scanning for a face.

Finally, the single bottom-firing speaker isn’t that great either. The audio sounds shallow, incomplete and you won’t hear all the details from this. Likewise, there is almost no bass from the speaker. On the contrary, the audio from the 3.5mm headphone jack is much better, but nothing extraordinary.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the Nokia 2.4 is a decent entry-level Android phone, whose stock Android experience, excellent battery life, and seamless design should speak volumes to many people. However, from a pure performance perspective, there are a lot better options out there in the market from companies like Xiaomi, Realme, etc.

  • Watch our video review of the Nokia 2.4.

Nokia 2.4 Review: Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Decent, sturdy build quality
  • Stock Android experience on a budget
  • Terrific battery life (almost a 2-day device)
  • Lightweight games work fine
  • Tall display with acceptable color quality, sharpness

Cons:

  • 2GB RAM variant has insufficient usable memory
  • The fingerprint scanner is slow and doesn’t work well
  • Camera performance is inconsistent
  • Gimmicky camera features
  • Terribly slow charging (5W)

Realme 7 Pro Review: Almost A Perfect Midrange Phone

Pratima Adhikari
-
0
Realme 7 Pro Review: Almost A Perfect Midrange Phone

Today, I will be talking about the new Realme 7 Pro. I have used this phone for quite a time now. Actually, I had it as my secondary phone while I was testing the Realme 7 for review, and switched to the 7 Pro as my primary phone after it was done. Regardless, how is the Realme 7 pro in real-life use? Should you pay more for this or just get the regular Realme 7 instead? Let’s discover in this review of the Realme 7 Pro.

Realme 7 Pro Specifications:

  • Body: 6.33 x 2.93 x 0.34-inches, 182gm
  • Display: 6.4-inches Super AMOLED panel, Corning Gorilla Glass 3+, 60Hz Refresh Rate, 90.8% screen-to-body ratio, 411 PPI, Always-on Display (AoD)
  • Resolution: FHD+ (2400 x 1080 pixels), 20:9 aspect ratio
  • Chipset: Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G (8nm mobile platform)
  • CPU: Octa-core (2×2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver)
  • GPU: Adreno 618
  • RAM: 6/8GB LPDDR4x RAM
  • Storage: 128GB UFS 2.1 internal storage (expandable)
  • Software & UI: Realme UI 1.0 on top of Android 10
  • Rear Camera: Quad-camera;
    – 64MP, f/1.8 Sony IMX682 primary lens
    – 8MP, f/2.3 ultra-wide lens; 119° FOV
    – 2MP, f/2.4 depth (BnW) sensor
    – 2MP, f/2.4 macro sensor
    – LED flash
  • Front Camera: 32MP, f/2.1 lens (punch-hole)
  • Security: In-display Fingerprint Scanner (optical)
  • Audio: 3.5mm headphone jack, Speakers
  • Connectivity: Dual-SIM (Nano), WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 5.1, GPS / A-GPS / Glonass / BDS / NavIC, USB Type-C, 4G LTE
  • Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Compass, Magnetic Induction
  • Battery: 4500mAh with 65W SuperDart Charge
  • Colors: Mirror Blue, Mirror Silver
  • Price in Nepal: N/A (not launched yet)

Realme 7 Pro Review:

Design

  • Ergonomic build and attractive design
  • A dual-tone color scheme at the back

First off, the design of the Realme 7 Pro looks incredibly attractive, especially the Silver color variant that I have with me. The company has given up on the gradient finish this time and this dual-tone finish looks different and overall, nice.

I also have to give credit to Realme for nailing the ergonomics as well. The phone is pretty light-weight with good grip and it’s not bulky like the last-gen Realme 6 Pro or its closest competition – the POCO X3. The build here is not glass, but rather plastic so it can get scratch easily in long run. I for one, do not mind the plastic build, but glass would certainly have been better.

And one more thing, Realme 7 Pro is a well-built phone too. If you have read our review of the Realme 7, you may know that I had huge concerns regarding its build quality, but that’s not the case here with the 7 Pro.

Display

  • 6.4-inch FHD+ Super AMOLED panel
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ protection
  • 60Hz refresh rate, minimal punch-hole cutout

Realme 7 Pro - Display

I also like the display quality of this device. It has good touch sensitivity and the color reproduction is fantastic as well.

Here you get a slightly smaller 6.4-inch AMOLED compared to the 6.6-inch IPS LCD panel on the Realme 6 Pro. It still retains the regular 60Hz refresh rate, but you guys know I would always go for a 60Hz AMOLED display over a 90Hz IPS one. Because of this, I don’t mind the tradeoff Realme has made on the 7 Pro.

Similarly, the punch hole cutout on the top is not obtrusive at all and is a lot better than the bulkier pill-shaped cutout we saw on its predecessor. This display can also get fairly bright, so all is well on the display front. And since this one’s an AMOLED screen, you get the fingerprint sensor baked inside the display itself which works perfectly most of the time. Moreover, it also comes with Always-on Display, so I couldn’t be happier about Realme 7 Pro’s display.

Realme 7 Pro - In-display Fingerprint Scanner

Well, although this panel is receiving a thumbs up in almost every aspect, I do have one little concern. It’s the fact that the display is only protected by Gorilla Glass 3+ while I think Realme should be at least offering Gorilla Glass 6. Matter of fact, that’s a direct downgrade from Realme 6 Pro that came with a tougher Gorilla Glass 5 protection.

Performance

  • Octa-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SoC (8nm)
  • 6/8GB of LPDDR4x RAM with 128GB UFS 2.1 storage (expandable)

Onto the performance, after having used this phone for about a month, I am not particularly disappointed with it, nor am I too excited about it.

What I mean is, Realme 7 Pro is supposed to be an upgrade over the 6 Pro but still you get the same level of performance as it houses the exact same Snapdragon 720G chipset. Maybe they could have gone with the Snapdragon 732G, which Is slightly better, I don’t know.. but, the newer snapdragon 750G would have been really great. Maybe we will see that on the Realme 8 Pro.

Realme 7 Pro - Design

Snapdragon 720G hasn’t particularly disappointed in terms of performance because, well, it is still a well-performing SoC that can handle a fair share of a load while being power efficient as well. I have not faced a single problem in my everyday use with this device. Normal tasks run flawlessly, apps open fast, and multitasking is a breeze – even with heavy apps.

Gaming

It’s only while gaming that I kind of wished the phone could do better and those were the times I wanted Realme 7 Pro to have a better processor. Yes, you can get a pretty smooth 35-40 fps gameplay under smooth graphics and ultra-frame rates in PUBG Mobile. But still, when it comes to gaming, I am greedy for a little bit more.

Other than PUBG, I played Call of Duty that can go upto “very high” graphics and “very high” frame rates and gives smooth gameplay. Also, other games like Asphalt 9, Infinity OPS, etc run very well on the phone.

Software & UI

  • Realme UI 1.0 on top of Android 10

Realme 7 Pro - Home

Getting to the software, you are greeted with the Realme UI 1.0 on top of Android 10, and next month, it is scheduled to receive the Realme UI 2.0 update based on Android 11.

Realme has considerably worked well with the security updates too. At the time of writing this review, my unit of the Realme 7 Pro is running on September’s security patch which is not bad for a mid-range phone. Yet, there is always room for doing better in this regard I guess.

Cameras

  • Quad-cameras at the back
  • (64MP primary, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, 2MP depth)
  • 32MP front-facing camera inside the punch-hole cutout

Now, let’s move to the cameras. Realme 7 Pro has 4 cameras at the back and a 32MP sensor for selfies. Sadly the telephoto lens that we saw on the Realme 6 Pro has been replaced by a not so useful 2MP depth sensor, which is a big letdown if you ask me.

Anyways the 3 remaining lenses here are an upgrade. You get a new 64MP Sony IMX682 wide-angle sensor which btw every other midrange phone is using these days. Then there’s an 8MP ultra-wide lens and finally, a 2MP macro sensor.

Normal Images

About the images from the primary lens, I am quite happy about them, to be honest. Under a well-lit condition, they are detailed and have a good dynamic range.

The best part is the colors in the pictures as they look very pleasing to the eye. Although you will instantly figure out that there is some color processing being done to make the images more popping.

Wideangle Images

Likewise, the wide-angle images have similar colors too, which is not the case with many other midrange phones I have tested so far.

They are not as detailed as the primary camera but look good nonetheless.

Macro Images

On the other hand, the macro images, like on most mid-range phones are pretty much useless.

vs POCO X3

And since I am also using the Poco X3 alongside Realme 7 Pro whose review should be out in a week’s time, I tested these 2 cameras as they use the same Sony sensor.

Normal Images

What I found was that the details on both devices were pretty much the same. However, Realme’s images are slightly punchier than Poco’s which is more noticeable in landscape images.

So, if you make me choose, I would definitely go for Realme’s camera setup because its images have a better dynamic range and pleasing color scheme.

Portrait Images

I’m fond of Realme 7 Pro’s portrait images too.

The phone manages to make the sky look really good in portraits which is why I prefer Realme 7 Pro’s portraits over Poco X3’s.

Also, the subject’s skin looks a little better on the 7 Pro.

Selfie Images

Moving on to the selfies, both Realme 7 Pro and Poco X3 have this unusual red tint in them. As a result, I am not a big fan of both of them.

But, the 7 Pro is capable of maintaining better background colors better than X3. In portrait selfies, both phones cannot manage good dynamic range and exposure in the background.

Nighttime Images

Nighttime images from the Poco X3 look slightly better as they have better details and natural-looking images while Realme saturates the pictures a bit more and is also inferior in detail.

There is also a dedicated Night mode on both phones, whose performance is neck-to-neck in regards to detail preservation and maintaining exposure.

But again, Realme saturates the images here too making them look a bit more processed and unnatural. So, this is one area where Realme can do better with a software update.

Videos

For videos, like any other mid-range phone, the Realme 7 Pro too can go up to 4k 30fps. At this resolution too, the footage is stable enough. However, the dynamic range isn’t as good as the 1080P footages. Also, if you want higher fps then you have the option to shoot in 1080p 60 fps as well. Although it lacks EIS, it is fairly stable with a good dynamic range and colors.

So, it’s not wrong to conclude that the cameras on this phone work well. Yes, technically, the macro lens isn’t that useful and I would have loved a telephoto zoom lens instead. Still, the primary camera does a good job, so overall, I am happy with Realme 7 Pro’s cameras.

Battery

  • 4500mAh battery with 65W SuperDart fast charging

Extending my happiness is the phone’s battery life. It has a 4500mAh cell, which I know isn’t a sizable upgrade from the 6 Pro. But with a more energy-efficient Super AMOLED panel and a 60 Hz display, it delivered a slightly better endurance than that of the Realme 6 Pro.

Realme 7 Pro - 65W SuperDart Charge

Not to forget the fact that it is coupled with a whopping 65-watt SuperDart fast charging support that fills up the device in no time. With this, you have to be a little worried about the phone’s battery health over the years, as a faster charging mechanism degrades the battery a-bit quicker.

Audio

  • 3.5mm headphone jack, stereo speakers

Additionally, the speakers on Realme 7 Pro give a stereo output which sounds very impressive – on paper. But in reality, they are not that good. I mean, it can get loud and the audio is fairly balanced, yet they kind of lack depth. It’s more than fine for casual listening and audio from the headphones sounds good enough too.

Conclusion

So, is the Realme 7 pro worth spending your money on? Well, yes, considering it almost ticks all the boxes of a good value for money smartphone. It is definitely better than the Realme 7 because of its superior build, AMOLED display, and better thermals.

However, call me a little greedy, but I think Realme could have made slightly better choices with the specifications. For instance, giving up on the 65-watt charging to put a better chipset would have been a wiser choice considering faster-charging tech can degrade the battery health in the long run and you know the last generation 30W charging is still very fast.

Or, instead of a better chipset, maybe the company could have given a 90Hz screen instead. I mean, imagine, if a 90Hz AMOLED screen came for Realme 7 Pro’s price, that would really make it stand out.

  • Watch our video review of the Realme 7 Pro.

Realme 7 Pro Review: Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Well-built phone with an ergonomic grip
  • Colorful, vibrant Super AMOLED display
  • A decent performance from Snapdragon 720G
  • Great camera phone for regular photos
  • Wicked fast 65W SuperDart charging

Cons:

  • Still no 90Hz refresh rate
  • Missing telephoto, wide-angle selfie lens
  • No chipset upgrade from its predecessor

Realme Narzo 20 Pro Review: Any Different Than The Realme 7?

Pratima Adhikari
-
0
Realme Narzo 20 Pro Review: Any Different Than The Realme 7?

Hello everyone, today I am going to talk about the Realme Narzo 20 Pro. It is very similar to the Realme 7 that recently saw a global launch. But unlike the Realme 7, it is only available in India and select parts of Europe. The biggest talking point of the Narzo 20 Pro is definitely the 65W fast charging—on a sub 15K Indian price. However, is it any better than the Realme 7? Let’s find out in our review of the Realme Narzo 20 Pro.

Realme Narzo 20 Pro Specifications:

  • Body: 6.39 x 2.97 x 0.37-inches, 191gm
  • Display: 6.5-inches IPS LCD panel, Corning Gorilla Glass 3+, 90Hz Refresh Rate, 90.5% screen-to-body ratio, 405 PPI
  • Resolution: FHD+ (2400 x 1080 pixels), 20:9 aspect ratio
  • Chipset: MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm mobile platform)
  • CPU: Octa-core (2×2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6×2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
  • GPU: Mali-G76 MC4
  • RAM: 6/8GB LPDDR4x RAM
  • Storage: 64/128GB UFS 2.1 internal storage (expandable)
  • Software & UI: Realme UI 1.0 on top of Android 10
  • Rear Camera: Quad-camera;
    – 48MP, f/1.8 primary lens
    – 8MP, f/2.3 ultra-wide lens; 119° FOV
    – 2MP, f/2.4 depth (BnW) sensor
    – 2MP, f/2.4 macro sensor
    – LED flash
  • Front Camera: 16MP, f/2.1 Sony IMX471 sensor (punch-hole)
  • Security: Physical Fingerprint Scanner (side-mounted)
  • Audio: 3.5mm headphone jack, Speakers
  • Connectivity: Dual-SIM (Nano), WiFi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, Bluetooth 5.0, GPS / A-GPS / Glonass / Beidou, USB Type-C, 4G LTE
  • Sensors: Accelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, Light, Magnetic Induction
  • Battery: 4500mAh with 65W SuperDart Charge (10V/6.5A)
  • Colors: White Knight, Black Ninja
  • Price in Nepal: N/A (not launched yet)

Realme Narzo 20 Pro Review:

Design & Build

  • Plastic build with a glossy finish (V-shaped pattern)
  • Relatively better build quality compared to Realme 7
Realme 7 vs Narzo 20 Pro
Left: Narzo 20 Pro | Right: Realme 7

So, the similarities that you will notice right away between the Narzo 20 Pro and the Realme 7 are how they have the same form factor, weight, and build material. The only major difference in terms of visual aesthetics lies at the back. While the Narzo 20 Pro has a gradient glossy finish, Realme 7 comes with this matte dual-tone color instead.

It’s still plastic, so I have already got some scratches on my unit. The frames are plastic as well, therefore durability is kind of a big problem in the long run. The right side of Narzo 20 Pro has a home button which doubles as a fingerprint as well. And like the Realme 7, it is fast and works almost all the time.

However, my unit of the Narzo 20 Pro doesn’t have creeks on the sides, which was there on the Realme 7. But all things considered, “Narzo” is supposed to be a different series from Realme and yet, they are borrowing the design of a pre-existing product. This screams a lack of inspiration and laziness from the Realme product department, to be honest.

Performance & Software

  • Octa-core MediaTek Helio G95 SoC (12nm)
  • 6/8GB of LPDDR4x RAM and up to 128GB UFS 2.1 storage (expandable)
  • Realme UI 1.0 on top of Android 10

Not just the design, you are going to get pretty much the same experience in terms of performance between the two phones. Both of them are running on the exact same version of Realme UI.

Realme Narzo 20 Pro - UI

It was also quite funny when I noticed that an update log on the Narzo 20 Pro mentioned “64MP professional mode” when the phone only has a 48MP camera. Since both these phones got the update on the same day, that might have resulted in the error, no biggie!

Anyways, the performance on the Narzo 20 Pro is quite good for the price, all thanks to the Helio G95 coupled with a higher 90Hz refresh rate display. However, with this Mediatek chipset, you need to be aware of a slight heating issue, that say, the Snapdragon 720G powered phones like the Redmi Note 9 Pro Max or the Poco M2 Pro don’t encounter.

Nonetheless, I still think that both Realme 7 and Narzo 20 Pro are stellar value for money phones for the price.

Display

  • 6.5-inch FHD+ IPS LCD panel
  • Corning Gorilla Glass 3+ protection
  • 90Hz refresh rate, minimal punch-hole cutout
Realme 7, Narzo 20 Pro - Display
Left: Narzo 20 Pro | Right: Realme 7

On the display front too, Realme still remains the only brand to offer a 90Hz panel on a budget device. This one is as good as the Realme 7, except for the color tone. Not much of a barn burner, but I did notice a slight variation in the display panel of these two phones.

Realme Narzo 20 Pro - Display

The tall 6.5″ FHD+ is nice to look at and the aforementioned 90Hz refresh rate makes all the difference on a phone of this price. Besides the dismissable color variation when compared to Realme 7, Narzo 20 Pro’s panel is great to look at. The colors, contrast, sharpness are great and so is its visibility.

Cameras

  • Quad-cameras at the back
  • (48MP primary, 8MP ultrawide, 2MP macro, 2MP depth)
  • 16MP front-facing camera inside the punch-hole cutout

More importantly, the area where I was a little bit worried about the Narzo 20 Pro was in the camera department, as it comes with an inferior 48MP Samsung GM2 sensor, as opposed to the Sony IMX682 we get in Realme 7.

Normal Images

But surprisingly, Realme has done an excellent job to match this sensor’s image quality with the Realme 7.

And as you can see from these images, both are almost identical.

Narzo 20 Pro slightly saturates the images at times, and the Realme 7 at times looks sharp. But apart from that, there’s no noticeable difference.

Portrait Images

The portrait images are however slightly better on Realme 7.

Yet, the one from Narzo isn’t that off either.

Nighttime Images

The night time images are also better on the Realme 7 as evident from these samples, but nothing too drastic.

Wideangle Images

And since both of these phones have the same 8MP ultra-wide-angle sensor, they are identical as well.

However, after receiving multiple updates, Realme 7 still has this issue where ultrawide images turn out dark.

Selfie Images

Getting to selfies, you get a 16MP camera here.

For what it’s worth, the selfies are good enough.

And again bringing Realme 7 to the mix, you can see that they both are identical.

Videos

Video wise, you can shoot in 1080P 30fps, 1080P 60fps, and 4K 30fps. And like the Realme 7, only the 1080P 30fps has EIS, so footages in higher resolution come out wobbly. Similarly, you can shoot from the ultra-wide-angle lens and front camera at 1080P 30fps. Comparing it with the Realme 7, the recordings from Narzo 20 Pro are quite similar.

Besides the cameras, another difference you can find between these two phones is in the battery department.

Battery

  • 4500mAh battery with 65W SuperDart Charge

Narzo 20 Pro ships with a 4500mAh battery and a 65W Super Dart Charging – which is another first for a phone of this price. On the other hand, you get a bigger 5000mAh battery, but with a comparatively slower 30W charging on the Realme 7.

Realme Narzo 20 Pro - 65W SuperDart Charge

During my test, the battery life has been good, but nothing extra-ordinary. The 90Hz display paired with a relatively energy inefficient 12nm chipset meant I had to plug in the battery when I got home from the office. In terms of endurance, the Realme 7 provided a slightly better battery life.

Moreover, the 65W fast charging is obviously very fast as I was able to fully charge the phone in just 37 minutes. Having said that, the 30W fast charging on the Realme 7 isn’t that slow in itself as it manages to juice-up the bigger 5000mAh battery in an hour.

Conclusion

All in all, the Narzo 20 Pro is a good value smartphone for the price – just like the Realme 7. After all, it is “just like” the Realme 7—both literally, and figuratively. So… why does the Narzo 20 Pro exist, to begin with? The Narzo series is supposed to cater to Gen-Z by offering hip & exciting features. However, in this case, does the flagship-grade 65W fast charging and minor tweaks to the camera setup deliver that? I don’t think so.

And launching both phones in the same region further complicates a buyer’s purchase decision – which is harmful to Realme itself if you ask me. As a result, it’s frankly boring and uninspiring to see this happen time and again. Not only Realme, but companies like Xiaomi and POCO have been doing the same as of late.

  • Watch our video review of the Realme Narzo 20 Pro.

Realme Narzo 20 Pro Review: Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Good-looking design and a compact build
  • Decent performance including gaming
  • Smooth 90Hz display with a minimal punch-hole cutout
  • Unheard of 65W fast charging on a budget phone
  • Sufficiently good camera capabilities

Cons:

  • Not an original design, but just a rebranded phone
  • Cameras are slightly inferior to Realme 7
  • The MTK Helio G95 is a little energy inefficient

Oppo announces high-precision RTK positioning algorithm for smartphones

GadgetByte
-
0
Oppo announces high-precision RTK positioning algorithm for smartphones

A few months after its announcement of next-gen hybrid optical zoom, Oppo has announced yet another breakthrough in smartphone technology. This time, in the mobile navigation system. Oppo says that it is now heading into a new era of mobile positioning with its latest RTK positioning algorithm.

Oppo Real-Time Kinematic (RTK) Positioning Algorithm

Announcement

Levin Liu, Oppo Vice President and Head of Oppo Research Institute, introduced the new mobile navigation system on November 2nd. According to Liu, the new RTK algorithm is the result of increased market demand for navigation systems. 5G networks have increased demand for improved navigation systems for both indoor and outdoor technology. Oppo is trying to fulfill them with its latest technology. Liu believes that Oppo’s latest breakthrough will benefit a wide range of uses in this 5G era.

RTK Positioning System

Oppo’s latest algorithm helps the current positioning technology in the smartphone industry. To begin with, the RTK Positioning system is not a new thing in itself but the fact that Oppo has figured out a way to incorporate it into a smartphone makes it a remarkable feat.

RTK Positioning system relies on carrier phase measurement for accurate results. It obtains data in real-time by measuring stations. It then processes them for precise positioning. The technology has been used for industrial measuring. The reason that we are seeing it being implemented in a smartphone now is that it is a complex technology that requires a number of complicated systems. These systems are too big to fit in smartphones.

Working of Oppo RTK Sytem

Oppo has developed an algorithm that mimics the working mechanism of an RTK system. The algorithm collects information from different smartphone sensors. It uses accelerometers and gyroscopes and uses them for accurate positioning. The algorithm also reduces the effect of signal interference. Oppo claims that the RTK positioning algorithm can provide accurate location within a one-meter radius.

Oppo RTK Algorithm Availability

As of now, Oppo is still fine-tuning its RTK algorithm. The company plans to commercialize the tech and says it will be commercially available in 2021.

  • Check out our review of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE.

Snapdragon 875 beats Kirin 9000 in a leaked Master Lu CPU benchmark result

GadgetByte
-
0
Snapdragon 875 beats Kirin 9000 in a leaked Master Lu CPU benchmark result

Huawei’s 5nm based Kirin 9000 SoC made its debut with the new Mate 40 series. Samsung has also confirmed that it will be unveiling the upper mid-range Exynos 1080 (5nm) next week. And now, popular tipster, Digital Chat Station, has leaked the Master Lu Benchmark result of the upcoming Qualcomm Snapdragon 875. Let’s learn more about the Snapdragon 875, along with its rumors and leaked benchmark results.

Leaked Master Lu Benchmark Result

Digital Chat Station, who is widely known for Xiaomi-related leaks, leaked the Master Lu Benchmark result of Snapdragon 875 via a post on Weibo. The upcoming flagship chipset from Qualcomm is codenamed “Lahaina”, which is a place in Hawaii. For those unaware, the company will unveil SD 875 via an event in Hawaii.

The result reveals that the prime core on the chipset will be clocked at 2.84GHz, which is the same as the frequency of the prime core on its predecessor. To compare, the Snapdragon 865+ has already surpassed the 3GHz barrier.

Snapdragon 875 vs Kirin 9000 vs Snapdragon 865

Coming back to the benchmark result, SD 875 managed to achieve a total score of 899,401, which is higher than both Kirin 9000 and Snapdragon 865. The last two chipsets managed to score 875,308 and 820,220, respectively in the same test. In the CPU test, Snapdragon 875’s score of 333,269 outscored Kirin 9000’s score of 275,862 by quite a margin. However, things were more competitive in the GPU department where Kirin 9000’s Mali-678 MP24 still reign at the top with a score of 344,334. Snapdragon 875’s Adreno 660 is not that far behind with a score of 342,225. Both 5nm based chipsets have better scores than Snapdragon 865 that is used in most of the flagship devices of 2020. Snapdragon 865 vs Kirin 9000 Master Lu Benchmark result

Since the test has been conducted on a prototype device, the figures will change slightly when the SD 875 starts appearing on retail units. Similarly, benchmark results are also affected by factors like RAM size and type of memory used. Here, the prototype device had 12GB of RAM compared to Mate 40 Pro’s 8GB. Similarly, Mate 40 Pro used a faster memory as evident by the score of the memory test (180,521 > 125,135).

Snapdragon 875 Rumors

Snapdragon 875 will be based on a 5nm process node. Like its predecessor, it will sport a 1+3+4 octa-core architecture with the prime core clocked at 2.84GHz. Thus, the boost in the performance will be due to the change in the core architecture. Qualcomm will be using a single Cortex X1 core as the prime core. The rest of the setup will include three Cortex A78 cores and Cortex A55 cores.

Snapdragon 875 Launch and Availability

Several reports suggest Qualcomm launch the Snapdragon 875 on December 1 via an event in Hawaii. According to Digital Chat Station, Xiaomi Mi 11 will be the first device to come equipped with the new chipset in China. Also, the chipset will be exclusive to Xiaomi for a predetermined period of time in the country. Outside of China, Samsung will be the first company to use the chipset for its S21 lineup.

Mobile Chipset Launch Date Devices
Snapdragon 875 December 1
  • Xiaomi Mi 11 lineup (China)
  • Samsung Galaxy S21 lineup (Outside of China)
  • Check out our review of the Samsung Galaxy S20 FE.

Best TV Operators in Nepal: Pricing, Picture Quality, Channels, Extras

GadgetByte
-
0
Best TV Operators in Nepal: Pricing, Picture Quality, Channels, Extras

Since there are a lot of TV operators in Nepal, it can get quite confusing when deciding which one is the best for you. To help you with that, we have tested and compared the most popular TV operators in Nepal against each other in an effort to name the best.

In this post, we are going to talk about our experience of using Clear TV, Dish Home, Max TV, Prabhu TV, and Via TV. To come to a conclusion, we have considered pricing, image quality, and availability of service of the aforementioned TV operators.

1. Pricing

Note: All the pricing details have been collected from the official resources as of Kartik 2077 B.S. As price is subject to change in the future, we’ll periodically update the article on their latest pricing policies as well.

Let’s start with pricing. If we only consider the Set-Top Box (STB), Max TV offers it at the least amount. On the other hand, Dish Home charges the heftiest One Time STB fee. And the high price is due to the fact that Dish Home users need to install a separate antenna to get their DTTH service running.

And if you are considering paying for a year in advance, Max TV will not take any charge for the STB. Similarly, Vianet offers a 50% discount if one opts for a yearly subscription to Via TV. While it wasn’t the case in the past, a house with multiple TVs is not rare these days. So each of the cable operators discussed in this support up to four TVs. Needless to say, multi-connection requires users to pay for each Set-Top Box and a monthly fee for each additional TV. However, in the case of Dish Home, you don’t need a separate antenna for every TV in your home.

Set-Top Box/Antenna cost (one time only):

S. N Cable Operators Cost Offer on a yearly contract
1 Max TV Rs. 565 Free
2 Prabhu TV Rs. 2,000 No offer
3 ViaTV Rs. 3,890 Rs. 2,195
4 Clear TV Rs. 2,500 No offer
5 Dish Home Rs. 4,000 No offer

*Installation charge: Rs. 500 (on Max, Prabhu, Dish home)
*Refund of Rs. 500 deposit on Via TV, Clear TV

Users can not choose from multiple subscription plans with Via TV and Prabhu TV. Thus, we have only considered Premium plans for this post. Even here, Max TV turns out to be the most affordable option. As evident from the table below, the cost of Prabhu TV is almost half of what Dish Home and Subisu’s Clear TV are charging for their premium users. Similarly, Via TV also ranks among the affordable ones.

Monthly cost (premium packages) 

S. N Cable Operators Price (Monthly) Offer on yearly subscription
1 Max TV Rs. 500 1 month free (new user)
3 months free (existing user)
2 Prabhu TV Rs. 350 Rs. 3,500 + 4 months free
3 ViaTV Rs. 395 Rs. 3,842
4 Clear TV Rs. 700 Rs. 5,492
2 months free (existing user)
5 Dish Home Rs. 700 Rs. 6,300

However, when it comes to the monthly fee for additional TV(s), each operator charges almost the same amount. Also, ViaTV offers the best offer for yearly subscribers.

Cost for each extra TV (monthly) ­­­­

Cable Operators Price (Monthly)
Max TV Rs. 226
Prabhu TV Rs. 250
ViaTV Rs. 226
Clear TV Rs. 250
Dish Home Rs. 200

To sum things up, Max TV looks to be the most affordable option if you are not ready for a long time commitment. However, in the long-term, Prabhu TV can also be a decent option.

2. Coverage

When it comes to coverage, no other operators can match Dish Home as it is the only operator in the nation that offers Direct-To-Home DTH technology. Since the STB directly communicates with the satellite via the antenna, one can have an active Dish Home connection even in the remotest regions. In the past, people used to experience issues related to signal interference with Dish Home because of bad weather and such. However, the situation has now been improved to some extent.

After Dish Home, we found Clear TV to have the best coverage among the cable TV operators in Nepal. In addition to its Kathmandu Head office, Clear TV has at least one branch in each five of the federal states. Max TV that uses a unique two-way technology also has similar coverage.

Similarly, the IPTV services by Wordlink and Vianet is limited to places under the area covered by each ISP, respectively. Prabhu TV’s Digital Terrestrial Television (DTT) signal based on Digital Video Broadcasting technology is available on Kathmandu Valley, Kaski, Chitwan, Dhankuta, Sunsari, and Morang. What we like about Prabhu TV is that it can even work with just a simple indoor antenna. However, the signal strength varies according to the region. So, in most cases, it becomes mandatory to install an outdoor antenna. Yet, the installation process is not complicated and one can do it without technical assistance.

3. Picture quality

To test the picture quality, we set up two LG 55UM73 4K UHD TV side-by-side with the picture settings left untouched at the default factory setting. The difference in the picture quality is insignificant if you are using a TV that is 40-inch or smaller. Still, if you have a TV that is 43-inch or bigger, it will be better to go with either Dish Home or Clear TV because they have superior picture quality. Also, we found Prabhu TV to have the best picture quality among the remaining three contenders.

However, the saturation and brightness level on the Prabhu TV is higher so at times the picture ends up looking unnatural. Also, Max TV’s picture quality is among the poorest between the five.

Another important thing to know is that one can notice significant delays (up to 30 seconds) on IPTV services like Via TV and Net TV compared to cable TV, which is a major disadvantage if you are into live sports. For instance, say you’re watching EPL with your buddies and are live-chatting alongside as well. So, in your friends’ non-IPTV broadcast, they’ll have celebrated a goal and texted you about the game, while your TV still lags seconds behind—ruining the viewing experience altogether.

4. Number of channels

Talking about channels, Clear TV and Max TV offer over 300 different channels. Similarly, Via TV has 251 channels. But Via TV does not offer additional SD channels for which it already has the HD channel. Prabhu TV only has around 150 channels and still misses out on many sports channels including the likes of Ten 3 HD. But it can be forgiven given the age of the company and its pricing. Dish Home also boasts up to 200 channels with plenty of HD and SD channels to choose from.

5. Extra features

Talking about the extra features, Max TV offers a lot of it, more than any other TV operator on this list. Because of its two-way technology, Max TV is able to provide services like YouTube and Videos On Demand, without a dedicated internet connection. Under the “Max Education” feature, there are subject-wise videos for students of all levels from Nursery to Diploma. Similarly, users can watch content that they originally missed via Catchup TV. Max TV also supports multi-language support using which users can watch channels like Discovery, and National Geography in more than one language.

However, Max TV still needs to revamp its UI and make it a bit faster than what it is now. It doesn’t offer an option to choose picture quality which was a bummer as the picture quality got unwatchably pixelated on our 55″ 4K TV. However, we still commend Max TV for offering so much while still remaining the cheapest TV operator.

Max TV - Extra Features
Max TV – Extra Features

Moving on, Dish Home offers exclusive channels that include Action Sports, Ramailo TV, Comedy Plus, and more. Also, at a time when cinema halls remain closed due to COVID-19, it has been airing new Bollywood and Nepali movies like “Khali Peeli”, “Shirful”, respectively on a Pay-Per-View (PPV) basis. Here, the PPV system is where a user has to pay extra cash on top of their TV subscription to watch certain exclusive content. Also, users can connect Wi-Fi dongle at the back of Dish Home’s new Setup Box to stream YouTube videos.

Similarly, ViaTV offers both YouTube and PPV services as well. Additionally, users can even turn to the MOMO TV app for Nepali videos, movies, songs, and music videos. These extra features are not available on either Prabhu TV and Clear TV.

Best TV Operators in Nepal: Conclusion

So, if you are looking for the best picture quality we recommend you go with either Subisu’s Clear TV or Dish Home. However, they are also among the most expensive ones. If Prabhu TV is available in your region, it is the best value for money among all the cable TV operators in Nepal in this list.

Yet, if you are currently subscribed to Vianet or Wordlink’s internet connection, it only makes sense for you to go for their respective IPTV services that come bundled with it—only if you’re not that into watching live events and the 30-second delay is not a deal-breaker to you. Finally, Max TV offers services like YouTube, Multi-language support, Max Education, and more, all without a working internet connection which may be of use to you.

  • Watch: Best TV Operators in Nepal [Nepali language]
1...552553554...984Page 553 of 984
© Gadgetbyte Nepal Pvt. Ltd. 2013-2025